Russia believes that the call by US Special Envoy to Syria James Jeffrey to “pull the plug” on the Russia-led Sochi and Astana talks on Syria is unprofessional and unconstructive, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told reporters on Wednesday.

“Such broad statements that if [progress on the Syrian constitutional committee is not achieved] by December, then that’s the end, are inappropriate here. For experts, this is a sign that those people who make these assessments are not professionals,” Zakharova said.

These statements play into the hands of those who oppose peaceful settlement and “these are additional arguments for the remaining extremists and militants.”

“In general, we consider that these statements, mildly speaking, are unconstructive. The political settlement process [in Syria] is not easy, and our experts are dealing with this on an everyday basis with their colleagues,” the diplomat said.

Washington has started explicitly demonstrating that Russia’s efforts on resolving the Syrian crisis are not advantageous for it, Zakharova noted.

“We have always emphasized that any timeframes imposed as a recipe are ineffective and destructive in this case. This is a delicate process and this concerns the future of the state system and the people, and this nation is multiconfessional and multiethnic.”

Earlier, US Special Envoy to Syria James Jeffrey suggested “pulling the plug” on the Sochi and Astana talks on peaceful settlement in Syria unless they yielded a decision on setting up a constitutional committee for the Arab state by mid-December.


Share this article:
  • 81
ALSO READ  Russian Air Force stalks jihadist positions across Idlib as Syrian Army offensive approaches
Editor-in-Chief Specializing in Near Eastern Affairs and Economics.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.


2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Floriangeyer Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

The US seems desperate for war wherever she can cause it.

The result in extremis will be a devastated America and what nation will Israel and Zionist interests suck dry then? 🙂

Weldon Cheek

And what does the u.s. envisage in place of the astana talks? Doesnt the fact that the u.s. is not holding any real cards in these talks make them see their comments are meaningless? They are only equal to daesh or hts in the syrian landscape, an illegal occupying force that is active in trying to destroy the legitimate government and impose its will on the people of syria, terrorists in all but name.