The US is unlikely to hand over its military bases in northern Syria near Turkey’s borders to anyone, as the transfer of the bases in the vicinity of its NATO ally would compromise Washington’s relations either with Turkey or with Russia, Mahmoud Afandi, a representative of Astana platform of the Syrian opposition, told Sputnik.

In December, US President Donald Trump announced that the United States would withdraw its roughly 2,000 troops from Syria since Daesh* had been defeated in the country. Media then reported that Trump had decided on the troops’ pullout only after being assured by Erdogan that Ankara would clear Syria of remaining Daesh militants

The US troops’ removal from Syria raised the issue of the fate of the US-backed Kurdish militias in the region, which are viewed by neighboring Turkey as an affiliate of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), listed as a terrorist organization by Ankara, bringing even more tensions to the region.

Turkey vs. Kurds

According to Afandi, one of the most delicate subjects related to the withdrawal of the US troops from Syria is the possible handover of the US military bases, with the Turkish forces and Kurdish militants being the two candidates to inherit them.

“The decision of Washington to withdraw troops complicates the situation in Syria because it basically strikes Turks and Kurds together. The most sensitive issue related to the withdrawal is the future of the American military bases in northern Syria, on the border with Turkey. The main three bases are in Kobani, Rmelan and Sarrin – all on the border with Turkey. When the troops leave, to whom are they going to hand over these bases – to Turkey or to Kurds?” Afandi said.

ALSO READ  Video footage of the Syrian Army inside western Khan Sheikhoun

Afandi indicated that both Turkey and Kurds as potential inheritors of the US military bases were likely to create problems for Washington in the political arena.

“Giving [military bases] to Turkey basically means giving it in the hands of the armed opposition, and, thus, triggering a confrontation with Russia, one of the guarantors [of the Syrian ceasefire]. Giving it to Kurds would trigger a confrontation with Turkey. None of this looks feasible, that is why I think that Americans will leave some contingent in these northern bases even after the troops’ withdrawal,” Afandi continued.

Possible Secret Scenarios

In early January, Turkish media reported that Ankara categorically urged Washington against the handover of 22 US military bases in Syria to the Kurdish forces after the troops’ withdrawal.

Shortly after, US National Security Adviser John Bolton paid a visit to Turkey during which the issue of the US forces’ withdrawal from Syria was raised. Bolton reiterated that Trump had asked Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan to be particularly careful about those Kurds who were involved in fighting terrorists in Syria in one row with the United States.

“In general, it aggravates the situation, and it could have been done on purpose because the United States does not seek an end to this conflict,” Afandi said.

Following the announcement of the US troops withdrawal, the Turkish leadership decided to postpone its planned offensive against Kurds in Syria’s north until the complete pullout of the US forces.

However, the step has not brought Ankara and Washington to a consensus regarding the Kurds position within the Syrian campaign, with the leadership of the two countries exchanging threats regarding the future developments in Syria.

ALSO READ  Turkish-backed rebels strike Russian military post in northern Aleppo

In the most recent case, the US president pledged to “devastate Turkey economically” if Turkey hit Kurds.

 

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 65
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    65
    Shares

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Peter Wallace
Member
Master
Upvoted
Commenter
Peter Wallace

What has this to do with Al Tanf. All it talks about are the bases on the other side of the country which are nothing to do with Al Tanf . Al Tanaf should be the first base to go as they are nowhere near any ISIS or Turkish or YPG/SDF forces . They are a very short drive from the Iraq border and can set up a new base there beside the Damascus – Baghdad hi- way if they choose. At Al Tanf they have the least of reasons for being in Syria except of course for nefarious ones.… Read more »

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

What al-Tanf as to do with it? Title seems yet another click-bait. Actually, al-Tanf is even the #1 pull-out area for Yankee troops since Daesh has been eradicated in the region and there is no Turkish-Kurdish issue here. Maybe was there an error in the title which should have been “US likely to withdraw from al-Tanf region first”????????? Personally, I don’t see any other solution than a transfer to a joint SDF+SAA+Russia team-forces since a Turkish transfer would be intolerable and pure betrayal towards Kurds. Assad may have to do some concessions to Kurds and maybe Yanks too e.g. a… Read more »