Washington has suggested that Delhi choose Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) and Patriot Advance Capability (PAC-3) anti-aircraft missile systems over Russia’s S-400s, the Indian newspaper Hindustan Times reports.

If India went ahead with the purchase, it could face sanctions from the US under a 2017 federal law that targeted Russia (as well as North Korea and Iran) with sanctions and prohibited any other nation from negotiating defence deals with these countries. Moscow has slammed the law as a declaration of “all-out trade war”.

Washington is understood to have pledged to grant a sanctions waiver to India last September despite its plans to buy the S-400s; however, the waiver expired in early May.

It comes after an official with the US Department of Defence said in March that the US was working on an “alternative choice” for India.

The S-400 is touted as one the most advanced air defence missile systems in the world, capable of firing three different types of missiles at a short-to-extremely-long range. The missiles can tackle a variety of targets, including aircraft jammers, reconnaissance aircraft, cruise missiles and short-range ballistic missiles.

New Delhi agreed to purchase the systems last October, via a deal worth $5.43 billion (the contract has been signed in Russian roubles). The deliveries are expected to proceed between October 2020 and April 2023.

The upcoming purchase has unnerved Pakistan, India’s long-time regional rival and a US ally, which voiced concerns that it could threaten strategic stability in the region.

India is not the first country looking forward to acquiring the S-400s. A similar move by Turkey has resulted in a long-running feud between Washington and Ankara.

For over a year now, Washington has been trying to convince its NATO ally, Turkey, to abandon a $2.5 billion S-400 deal, threatening to suspend the delivery of F-35 fighter jets, despite the fact that Ankara has already paid for several of them. The United States is afraid that incorporating the Russian system into NATO’s wider air defence system would expose the top jets to security risks.

ALSO READ  Indian pilot shot down by Pakistani military returns to service

Ankara has repeatedly shrugged off US threats and reaffirmed its stance on sticking to the deal.

“When Turkey signs an agreement, Turkey keeps its promise. We signed this agreement and certain payments were made. I don’t think the arguments and concerns here have a lot to lean on,” Turkey’s vice president said last week.

 

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

1
Discuss

avatar
1 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Daeshbags-Suxjeff spinner Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
jeff spinner
Guest
jeff spinner

I thought I read that Saudi Arabia HAS a S400 system already? Along with the US PAC3s, but Idk if they have the THAAD or not. Why can’t Turkey, India or anyone else have one, especially given the PAC3’s have proven useless against Yemeni Scuds over and over again? The Patriots tend to hit the detached missile body and leave the warhead untouched to impact… They SAY it’s because they don’t want the Russians to tune their radars to the F35, but then, they shouldn’t have flown F35s in Syria, because I guess they forgot the Russians have an S400… Read more »

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

“I thought I read that Saudi Arabia HAS a S400 system already? Along with the US PAC3s, but Idk if they have the THAAD or not.” => THAAD has been ordered last month, they have started to pay. But US deployed their own THAAD It’s not clear if KSA ordered S-400 or not, it was in talks, and it infuriated Trump ” Why can’t Turkey, India or anyone else have one” => Turkey talks like an enemy, thinks like like an enemy, acts like an enemy, so Turkey is? An ally on paper, but it’s the only area they are… Read more »