FILE - Health workers remove the body of a 29-year-old man who local residents say died of Ebola in Monrovia, Liberia.

President Barack Obama is due to announce new measures Tuesday to help fight the worst-ever Ebola outbreak in West Africa, including sending 3,000 U.S. troops to the region.

A White House statement detailing the program said the troops will be sent to a new command center in Liberia’s capital, Monrovia, where they will help with the transportation of supplies and personnel.

The U.S. will also build and staff Ebola treatment centers, and set up a facility to train 500 healthcare workers a week.

The White House said the goal of the program is to control the Ebola epidemic at its source, lessen the economic and political toll it takes on the region and build up global “health security infrastructure” in West Africa and beyond.

The United States Agency for International Development will also carry out a campaign to hand out protection kits and train people to protect themselves and their families. It will initially target the 400,000 most vulnerable households in Liberia, and then expand to cover all of Liberia and the region.

The Ebola virus has infected more than 4,700 people in West Africa, spreading from Guinea to Sierra Leone, Liberia, Nigeria and Senegal. Liberia has been the hardest hit, accounting for about half of the more than 2,400 deaths.

Obama is traveling Tuesday to the headquarters of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta to meet with health experts and publicly announce the new U.S. efforts.

A White House spokesman said Monday that because of its capability, the United States has a unique responsibility to step up in the midst of the international crisis.

ALSO READ  Russian military building new base near US forces in northeast Syria

The new programs will bring the total U.S. commitment to fighting the Ebola outbreak to $175 million dollars.

Diplomats say the U.N. Security Council will hold an emergency meeting on the Ebola crisis on Thursday. They say it will only be the second public health crisis discussed by the council, which met on the AIDS pandemic in 2000.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power said the Ebola situation is dire and the international community must work together to stem its spread.

“I don’t need to tell any of you how unusual Security Council debates on public health issues and public health crises are, but at this moment it is crucial that council members discuss the status of the epidemic, confer on a coordinated international response, and begin the process of marshaling our collective resources to stop the spread of the disease,” said Power.

In a recent interview with NBC’s Meet the Press, President Obama said while Ebola does not pose an imminent threat to Americans, containing the outbreak is a top national security priority.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.