BEIRUT, LEBANON (8:00 P.M.) – Republican Senator John Thune proposed the purchase of the Russian S-400 air defense systems from Turkey, and for that he proposed an amendment to the National Defense Budget Allocation Bill 2021 (NDAA) published on the Congress website.

The parliamentary proposal does not indicate whether Ankara has the desire and right to resell the complexes without permission from Moscow.

In turn, the chairman of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Jim Reach, proposed an amendment that would impose sanctions on Turkey in accordance with the “CAATSA” law (the Act Against America’s Sanctions through Sanctions).

Deliveries of the latest Russian S-400 air defense systems, which caused an issue in relations between Turkey and the United States, began in mid-July 2019.

Washington demanded that the deal be abandoned, and in return, buy U.S. Patriot systems, along with Washington’s threat to delay or even cancel the sale of the latest F-35 fighters to Turkey, as well as restrictive measures.

Ankara refused to make concessions and negotiations continued on an additional batch of the S-400.

In fact, the United States has complied with only a portion of the threats related to the F-35 training, and no other sanctions have been applied, although it should be imposed under the “CAATSA” law.

 

Source: Sputnik

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share
ALSO READ  Erdogan threatens Greece: Turkey has military power to 'tear up immoral maps'

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.