BEIRUT, LEBANON (12:00 P.M.) – The U.S. State Department commented on the statement from the Jordanian monarch, King Abdullah II, who said that Israel’s planned annexation of the West Bank will undoubtedly lead to a “massive conflict” between them and the Hashemite Kingdom and

“The United States has close ties with Jordan. We know that Jordan plays a special role in the Middle East, especially its relationship with Israel,” said State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus on Friday.

“What we hope for Israel and Jordan is that they will have a strong relationship not only at the security level, but also at the diplomatic and economic levels,” Ortagus said.

She added, “Of course we understand that the King expressed his concern today, and it is precisely for this reason that we believe it is important to return to President Trump’s vision of peace and bring all parties to the negotiating table to work towards achieving this peace plan.”

On Israeli plans to annex part of the West Bank, Ortagus said that discussions on this issue should take place between Israel and the Palestinians as part of the peace process.

She declined to respond directly to the question whether Washington gave a “green light” for Israel to annex parts of the West Bank.

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share
ALSO READ  Bolsonaro continues privatization push in Brazil

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

3 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
gzman501
Regular
Upvoted
gzman501
2020-05-17 04:51

Is forced subjugation the new definition of ‘peace’?

gzman501
Regular
Upvoted
gzman501
2020-05-17 04:52

Is awaiting moderation your term for we only post c**p from douchebags?

Daeshbags Sux
Daeshbags Sux
2020-05-17 20:51

From a legal POV, there wouldn’t be an annexation since the ONLY legitimate map under international law is the San-Remo treaty. It was Jordan which illegally annexed Judea-Samaria (renamed West-Bank by Arabs after Israel took it back in 1967) in 1948.
comment image
Therefore, speaking about annexation of areas like Jericho or Bethlehem or even parts of Jerusalem is pure propaganda and blatant lies, like it or not.
Golan Heights are an annexation, the Antioch (Hatay) province grabbed by Turkey on Syria in 1939 is an annexation. Judea-Samaria won’t.