The Navy seeks longer-range torpedoes as part of a greater strategy to keep submarines further away from potential targets while a third party, such as a P-8 Poseidon aircraft, provides targeting data, Brian Clark of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments told Defense News Wednesday.

“If you can extend that range to 50 or more miles, you can attack submarines without your sub having to hold that target organically with its sensors,” Clark, an analyst and former submarine officer, said. Firing at a target 50 miles away would not necessarily give away the location of the submarine, facilitating the goal of remaining out of sight.

By capitalizing on this method, submarines could serve as a submerged platform loaded with a lot of weapons — and get the most out of those weapons. “If you have 30 torpedoes on board, you may only have one or two targets within range of your sensors and weapons,” the analyst noted.

The idea is to adopt tactics the surface Navy is developing. For instance, the US is developing techniques to monitor aerial conditions for ballistic missile launches. The concept being developed by the surface Navy is to have an F-35 or E-2D collect and relay kill-quality data to the surface ship, which would then seek to neutralize a hostile asset with long-range missiles.

In order to accomplish the new underwater warfare tactic, to delegate target-tracking duties to third-parties instead of the sub itself, the Office of Naval Research gave Aerojet Rocketdyne about $2.6 million on Tuesday to develop more efficient engines for the Mark-48 torpedo that travel further on the same amount of the Navy’s standard Otto fuel propellant, Defense News reported.

ALSO READ  Ukraine: Far-right Azov Battalion hold parade for fourth 'victory' anniversary (video)

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 14
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    14
    Shares
The International News Desk reports on issues and events world wide.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

1
Discuss

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
James Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
James
Guest
James

Why would you put a P-8 in hostile territory if it was wartime? It’s a big, easy target that disables the benefit of long-range torpedoes as soon as it gets taken out!