Fierce battles are still raging in the Northern outskirts of Aleppo as Al-Qaeda Syrian branch, Jabhet Al-Nusra, and allied Islamic factions desperately try to push ISIS back and recapture Soran town.

For the first time, the US-Led Coalition conducted 4 airstrikes to help Al-Nusra hold tough against ISIS, killing scores including military commander Abu Thaer Al-Ansari. The airstrikes targeted ISIS HQ in Soran (formerly the town Hall), Al-Bel and Umm Hosh villages.

Soran is nearly 10 km from Azaz and the strategic Bab Al-Salamah border crossing, what might explain the US’ determination to prevent ISIS from getting closer to the Turkish borders.

The anti-ISIS coalition airstrikes was so far limited to provide aerial assistance to Kurdish militia (YPG) and allied forces in Kobani, Al-Hasakah and Al-Raqqa outskirts.

Opposition sources said the airstrikes came after three-day long negotiations with Kurdish YPG in nearby Afrin (only 35 km from ISIS stronghold in Soran), where the two side discussed YPG’s potential involvement in the battles.

Such involvement has so far been suspended as opposition denied the Kurdish militia a permanent foothold in opposition-held areas in the northern outskirts of Aleppo, a source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, revealed.

The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights cited local activists confirming the airstrikes have killed seven family members in the village of Dali Hassan on Sunday.

Earlier, local sources said more than 200 Al-Nusra fighters have defected to ISIS as the opposition fears further advance by ISIS might very well cut off their supply route to its militants, namely the newly-found “Fateh Halab” operation room.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
ALSO READ  Turkish-backed militants attack Syrian Army troops in northeast Syria

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mary Shabbiha Cassandra Woodward
Mary Shabbiha Cassandra Woodward
2015-06-09 13:01

I have the terrible sense that the author is supporting the war criminal US, in its illegal bombing of the Syrian Arab Republic, and that the murderous, takfiri JaN is somehow being supported over the murderous takfiri ISIL.

I also do not understand why the author is not using the correct name for Ain al Arab, or why the convicted felon/Brit intelligence operative is being cited as a source of information.