The Russian Defence Ministry has commented on the disagreements with the United States over the landmark INF Treaty, as well as the situation in Syria, particularly in areas, controlled by the US-led coalition and its allies.

Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu recently sent two notes to US Secretary of Defence James Mattis, one of them was about Syria, the ministry stated. The document

“…the US-led international coalition has been unable to complete the defeat of Daesh* terrorist units near the locality of Hajin in the past 6 months”, the ministry said.

According to the statement, 2,000 militants continued to control nine settlements along the east bank of the Euphrates River, where in recent months at least 1,500 civilians have been killed in US-led coalition airstrikes.

The ministry, said Shoigu in the note to Mattis, also focused on the problem of the Rukban camp, where over 50,000 Syrians are located.

“The American military base in At Tanf and the US-controlled armed gangs in that area are the main obstacles for the Rukban refugees in obtaining the necessary assistance and organising their return to their former homes”, it said.

The document also expressed deep concern over the growing Kurdish-Arab contradictions, pointing out there had been no progress in the US-supported “autonomous administration” on the east bank of the Euphrates in restoring peaceful life to Syria, adding that hydrocarbon smuggling, which was taking place with actual US connivance, negatively affected the prospects of restoring the Syrian economy.

 

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 184
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    184
    Shares
ALSO READ  US withdrawal from Syria should pave way for peace: Iraqi President
The International News Desk reports on issues and events world wide.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Tall cool one
Guest
Tall cool one

It’s not that the U.S. coalition forces cannot defeat daesha, it’s that we care about civilian casualties and try to avoid them. While Russia and it’s cronies just bomb everyone without a care about civilian casualties. The U.S. can and will defeat daesha on it’s own time. We may do it slower but way less civilian casualties.

Member
Newbie
Commenter
Upvoted
Karel Vd Geest

For Russia there are two US problems. SDF and Al Tanf. The latter is, to me at least, not completely clear, at both sider tbh.

SDF has solved the Hajin pocket problem. The remainder for the coming weeks. The solution for SDF in general lies in the hands of Assad. If and when he agrees to a form of autonomy, then there is no more problem.

Member
Newbie
André Mendes

Sim, vimos isso em Raqqa e nas demais guerras desse país nojento.