BEIRUT, LEBANON (1:00 P.M.) – In a new report recently released, CNN revealed that U.S. Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, refused to support an investigation into the sale of weapons from Washington to Riyadh, which had been launched by former Secretary General Inspector Stephen Linnick and his recent article from office.

The channel quoted Elliot Engel, vice-chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee in Congress, as saying that Linnick, at his request, was conducting an investigation into the U.S. sale of $8 billion in arms to the Saudi authorities.

Engel said that the Trump administration announced, in 2019, the imposition of a state of emergency in the country specifically to avoid the need to obtain congressional approval of the arms deal, adding that he did not rule out abuses in this matter, including by Pompeo.

CNN sources in Congress said that the Secretary of State refused to meet Linnick, whom he wanted to ask a number of questions in the context of his investigation, which was close to completion.

Pompeo said in an interview with The Washington Post published on Monday that he advised President Donald Trump to dismiss Linnick from his position because he was not performing his duties “as he should”, without revealing details.

In a CBS interview on Sunday, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested that Trump’s decision to sack Linnick might have been illegal if the desire for revenge was the underlying motive.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share
ALSO READ  All 5 Iranian tankers enter Atlantic en route to Venezuela

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
Rate Article
What do you think of the article?
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments