BEIRUT, LEBANON (1:50 P.M.) – The International Tribunal for Lebanon delivered their verdicts for the Rafic Hariri assassination, which took place on February 14th, 2005, in Beirut.

The sentencing session was attended by Rafik Hariri’s son, former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri, and the family of the former MP and Minister Basil Fuleihan, who spent time with Hariri.

The members of the court and the attendees began the session by observing a moment of silence in memory of the victims of the Beirut Port explosion.

Judge David Ray, while reading the summary of the verdict, said that the court relied on communications data to investigate the perpetrators of the Hariri assassination, as  the defendants used communication devices to coordinate the assassination.

Ray said, “The prosecution’s case was based on evidence of communications, and investigators looked at the records of millions of calls to discover evidence, and the phone records that were used in the vicinity of the Ministry of Parliament and the location of the assassination were examined.”

Judge Ray said that the Hariri assassination was a terrorist operation that was carried out for political purposes.

Judge Ray said, “Hezbollah and Syria benefited from the assassination of Hariri, but there is no evidence of the party leadership’s responsibility, nor direct Syrian involvement in it.”

Ray contintinued that the attack on Marwan Hamadeh could be interpreted as a warning to Hariri and Walid Jumblatt not to stir trouble with Syria, noting that the assassination  coincided with the visit of Walid al-Muallem, the Syrian Minister of Foreign Affairs, to Hariri’s home, in addition to a meeting at the Bristol Hotel for opponents of the Syrian presence in Lebanon.

ALSO READ  Lebanese-Armenians burn effigy of Erdogan in protest outside Turkish embassy: video

The International Court pointed out that Lebanese security forces removed important evidence from the crime scene immediately after the bombing.

The Special Tribunal for Lebanon confirmed that the First Instance Chamber concluded that a suicide bomber carried out the attack, not Abu Adass, and the explosives were loaded into the compartment of a Mitsubishi truck that was stolen from Japan and sold in Tripoli to two unidentified men.

Commenting on the session, Lebanese President Michel Aoun said, “The assassination of Prime Minister Hariri greatly affected the lives of the Lebanese people and the course of events in Lebanon, and we must accept what will be issued by the International Tribunal, even if the late justice is not fair.”

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.