The UK has stopped insisting on regime change in Damascus and the departure of President Bashar al-Assad, Izvestia’s sources in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office said. They stressed that the UK approved efforts to release political prisoners and create a safe and neutral environment that would allow Syrians to hold a free, honest, and credible election under UN supervision.

An informed source in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office noted that London did not rule out that the current leadership could stay in office. At the same time, he highlighted the need for real changes in Syria, calling for an end to arbitrary arrests. He also urged Damascus to adhere to OPCW provisions on the non-use of chemical weapons and allow refugees to return home.

For its part, officials in Damascus are certain that Western countries are not really interested in a political solution to the crisis.

“The West blocked the launch of the Constitutional Committee fearing that it would help achieve a political settlement and, hence, steer Syria out of the crisis,” senior Syrian lawmaker Ammar al-Assad stressed to Izvestia.

The fact that the West has abandoned its previous rhetoric means that the balance of power in Syria has changed, member of the Russian Federation Council (upper house) Alexei Pushkov told the paper.

“When the Islamic State [IS, outlawed in Russia — TASS] had Damascus surrounded, the West insisted on Assad’s ouster. They [Western countries] understand that it is impossible to make him step down now given that he controls about 80% of the country’s territory. Raising the issue of his resignation under these circumstances would be tantamount to demonstrating a complete misunderstanding of the situation,” he emphasized.

ALSO READ  Syrian Army intercepts US armored convoy in Hasakah: photos

 

Source: TASS

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

5 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Willy Van Damme
Willy Van Damme
2019-10-05 22:05

They have no business in Syria. What would London think if the Syrian government said to the UK wat to do with Brexit? The UK still think they are in 1919 when they with the French were dictating events in the Middle East.

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
2019-10-06 12:39

It would have been better had the French been in charge of much more : there wouldn’t be monarchies…
Thus, it’d had been a much better idea to only decolonise 1 or 2 centuries later…

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
2019-10-06 12:39

Considering the mess they all made

Nestor Arapa
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Nestor Arapa
2019-10-06 04:02

Hipocresía total de Reino Unido, por qué no pide que se democratice la Monarquía Saudí, donde no existe los derechos humanos, no existe los derechos de las mujeres, etc.

JOE
Regular
Upvoted
Commenter
JOE
2019-10-06 15:36

THERE IS A REASON FOR THAT, EVERYONE THAT WANTED HIM DITCHED IS NO LONGER HAS THE POWER BECAUSE THEY BEEN DITCHED THEMSELVES.