(Reuters) – Ride service Uber, which is trying to enhance its image after several controversies, on Friday released the findings of a report on its handling of passenger data and said it would act on all the report’s recommendations for improvements.

Lawyers at Hogan Lovells, who wrote the report commissioned and paid for by Uber, found that the smartphone app-enabled service had appropriate guidelines and procedures in place for internal access control, data security and data retention.

The report said Uber could improve privacy and data security by taking steps such as providing training for employees, making policies easier for customers to understand, and tightening access controls.

Management at the San Francisco-based company, which announced the report’s findings in a blog post, said on Friday it had already begun putting the recommendations into effect.

Uber commissioned the report in November, shortly after a dinner where a company executive raised the idea of hiring researchers to examine and disclose activities of media critics. It also emerged that Uber executives sometimes used an internal tool called “God View” to track specific customer rides, including the ride of a reporter for the news outlet Buzzfeed.

The incidents provoked strong public criticism, including from Senator Al Franken of Minnesota, who sent letters to Uber and rival service Lyft asking about the companies’ privacy procedures. Each company responded, but Franken has asked Uber for further details.

In a conference call with reporters on Friday, Hogan Lovells lawyer Harriet Pearson said Uber had “dedicated significantly more resources to its privacy program than other companies we’ve observed of similar age, sector and size.”

ALSO READ  Watch: Russian and Egyptian special forces in action

The report also said employees had received clear communication from management on the importance of privacy, and that the company’s internal audit unit was developing plans to evaluate the tone in at Uber’s top level in the context of regular audits.

Uber has proven extremely popular with customers, who like the convenience of requesting a ride using a smartphone app. The company has expanded quickly, offering services in 54 countries. But it has met challenges from regulators and lawmakers, leading to bans in some cities, such as Las Vegas.

On Thursday, a passenger who says she was raped by her Uber driver in New Delhi filed a U.S. federal lawsuit, claiming the company failed to maintain basic safety procedures.

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.