The Turkish parliament was Tuesday to start a much-delayed debate on a contentious security bill boosting the powers of police to crack down on protests, which activists fear will effectively create a police state under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

The so-called “homeland security reform” bill was submitted to parliament by the ruling Islamic-rooted Justice and Development Party (AKP) after deadly pro-Kurdish protests in October.

With the opposition threatening to hold up the work of parliament in protest at the bill, the opening of debates had been postponed repeatedly over the last weeks.

The debate was further delayed Tuesday by motions over the murder of a female student that has shocked Turkey. But the issue was still registered to be debated later in the evening.

The bill broadens police powers to carry out searches during protests and gives police the powers to detain people for up to 48 hours without the authorisation of a prosecutor.

It also permits police to use firearms to prevent an attack in a public place against people using Molotov cocktails or similar weapons.

It gives provincial governors the authority to instruct police to pursue suspects, without needing to go through the judiciary.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan says the new “homeland security reform” bill must be put in place as soon as possible

Erdogan said Tuesday the bill should have been legislated long before, adding that it was a step that came “late.”

“The homeland security law must rapidly pass right now and be put into practice as soon as possible.”

ALSO READ  Israeli forces post images of targeted sites inside Syria

The president also warned protesters that they had no chance of changing the country’s course under his leadership.

“I want to appeal to those who… think they can change the country’s direction through a couple of street protests, Molotovs: You will not succeed. You are working in vain. This train will not go off the track,” he said.

– ‘It will explode’ –

In a note to lawmakers, the AKP stood behind the legislation and said it was compatible with the EU laws, describing it as a “package protecting freedoms”.

It argued that in countries such as Austria, Italy, Germany and Britain security forces are granted the right to search people and vehicles without prior authorisation.

Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, wrote on Twitter: “Turkey can’t hide behind EU laws to justify its sorry record of police abuse and detention of non-violent protesters.”

Fires blaze on the streets of Ankara during protests in 2013

The bill has been submitted after Erdogan was shaken by protests in 2013 against his rule which were eventually broken up by tough police tactics.

But the ostensible trigger for the bill was violent protests in southeastern Turkey and Istanbul on October 6-7 over Turkey’s Syria policy. The protests left scores of people dead.

The draft sparked outrage among lawyers and opposition parties and around 3,000 lawyers rallied to the parliament on Monday in protest at the bill.

Levent Gok, of the main opposition CHP party, said it would increase police violence and undermine the right to life and called on Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu to withdraw what he called an “atomic bomb.”

ALSO READ  Saudi Arabia and Qatar among 5 countries 'on the agenda' for normalization with Israel: minister

“Hey, prime minister — this is an atomic bomb, it will explode in your hand,” he said.

If passed, the law risks jeopardising the peace process between the Turkish government and the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

The PKK’s political wing KCK said in a statement on Sunday that the security bill would put the Kurdish peace process “in danger,” adding that it would lead to more authoritarianism.

Government officials have been locked in talks with Kurdish representatives in the hope of reaching a deal on disarmament of the separatist rebels by Kurdish New Year in March.



Share this article:

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.