BEIRUT, LEBANON (12:00 A.M.) – U.S. President Donald Trump declared on Thursday that the U.S.-backed forces had taken back “100 percent” of the Islamic State’s (ISIS/ISIL/IS/Daesh) so-called ‘caliphate’.

“We just took over, you know, you kept hearing it was 90 percent, 92 percent, the caliphate in Syria. Now it’s 100 percent we just took over, 100 percent caliphate,” Trump said on Thursday while speaking to soldiers at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska during a refueling stop for Air Force One.

Trump’s declaration comes just a day after his meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Hanoi.

Despite the U.S. President’s claims, the Islamic State still maintains a rather large pocket inside the Badiya Al-Sham region that is located between the Deir Ezzor, Homs, and Al-Sweida governorates.

 

 

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 251
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    251
    Shares
ALSO READ  Massive explosions hit Damascus after Israeli strikes: video

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Peter Wallace
Member
Master
Upvoted
Commenter
Peter Wallace

Good , now they can all leave , no excuses ..

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Not forcedly! Since SAA didn’t fulfilled its duty of evacuating populations, people in Rojava are absolutely entitled at reclaiming their independence and since they invited the Yankees…

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Does anyone here but me has red Hague Convention and UN Charter?

Peter Wallace
Member
Master
Upvoted
Commenter
Peter Wallace

No I didn’t read them and never played by those rules otherwise I would be dead in a war where no one played by the rules. America were never invited by the Syrian government so they can F… off. Always sticking their nose in where it was not wanted. Oh they don’t play by the rules either as tens of thousands of dead and mutilated women and children can testify too. Can you get it in your head sux , I don’t give a flying f^&k what you think. .

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

This is international law, baby! By not fulfilling its obligations on its public, Syrian govt loses its right on the lost areas.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

ISIS having done attacks on US and their allies, going after them wherever they are is also absolutely legitimate.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

And frankly, Assad+Putin should even thank the Yanks : since they were distracting ISIS, they had it easier to deal with Nusra’n’Co.

rabbi drewzif
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
rabbi drewzif

Does it make any difference what you’ve read as you can only spout the Israeli/zionist agenda from your autocue ? 🙂

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

drewzif : Zionists have never been a problem unless you fück with them. Islamofascists and Nazislamists are a problem.

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, sorry – did You really?

Sometimes sounds different.

p.s. The US signed them with crossed fingers.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Yup I did. I didn’t said I agree on anything. I’m OK with the use of hollow point bullets, tear-gas, cluster-bombs and napalm.

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, guess the French also signed with crossed fingers. 😀

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, the SAA did not have the resources to defend or evacuate two thirds of Syria. Since the US undeniably supported their “vetted” Jihadi and FSA, they are a party in this war and You cannot legally invite them.
The reason, why the US had ONE justification to come to Syria, was IS tried to or did commit genocide. Genocide Convention. UN General Assembly Resolution 260. Article I: The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, …, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

“the SAA did not have the resources to defend or evacuate two thirds of Syria” => Never said the contrary, but Hague Convention says nothing about resources, it says it’s the duty of national army

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

to evacuate civilians from war zones.

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, to deduce any right from SAA’s failure to do the duty to evacuate – You need to prove that the SAA neglected that duty to evacuate intentionally.

Because locking resources are legal justifications.

An army that fails to defend because of lack of resources is not legally responsible either. Else you justified the Melice and the Charlemagne SS. 😛

The same legal logic – pure and simple.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

USA doesn’t officially “vetted” Jihadi and FSA, since congress allowed no budget. The ‘deep state’ is something else and…

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

…even Kerry was recorded saying in an opposition meeting his admin was doing smth illegal [under US laws]. Trump pulled CIA out.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

It’s a way more complex picture than everybody would like to think, there was even deliberate opposition and sabotage from inside CIA and DoD.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

CIA and DoD/DIA also torpedoed the thing, it’s obvious. You don’t end with so much leaks without them being behind.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Same for the leaks on Killary, etc : it’s not from Russian hackers : it came from NSA.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

What you had was mostly due to Qatari lobbying, bribes etc on the Obongo admin, and some other states to get political support.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

And training for militants, vetting of arms transfers, logistical support…

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Things also GREATLY escalated due to Assad called Iran+Hezb for help : It made the Saudis go bonkers, then came a massive shipping of TOW ATGMs, etc…

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Which itself triggered the Russian intervention

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, so was Syria wrong to call for help or what?

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, the US have voted budgets for their services and thus are fully responsible for their services’ actions. So the US carry full responsibility that their deep state has acted against UN’s A/RES/2625(XXV). = Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. And the rocket attacks because of the alleged use of chemicals in fighting were open acts of aggression and war.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Any way, as ANY permanent member of UNSC (China, Russia, France, UK), the Yankees do what they want since they can veto any UNSC decision and we both know it.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Russia isn’t doing better (Georgia/South-Ossetia, Ukraine), maybe even worst…

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Same with China or UK : Paracel islands belong to the Philippines, Malvinas (Falklands) to Argentina…

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, the people living now on the Islas Malvinas are Brits and want to be British.

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, we also know that it is totally illegal.

Member
Regular
Upvoted
Gustavo Lopez Velazquez

Do you remember those USA declaration “USA-UK have defeated Germany, when Russia was annihilating Germany in Berlin ? or the USA declaration of have defeated Japan when Russia was destroying Japan in Manchuria, forcing Japan to surrender ?

notonato
Member
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted
notonato

Stinks like DbS here. Or is it de BS