President Trump’s national security adviser, John R. Bolton, who is often described as a war hawk and known for his support of the 2003 invasion of Iraq and his advocacy of the bombing of North Korea, Iran and Syria, seems to have given up on his “Assad must go” rhetoric, at least temporarily.

Speaking to CBS News on Sunday about the prospects for the upcoming Putin-Trump summit in Helsinki on July 16, Bolton suggested that Syria was one area where Russia and the US “might make progress together.”

“We’ll see what happens when the two of them get together. There are possibilities for doing a larger negotiation on helping to get Iranian forces out of Syria and back into Iran, which would be a significant step forward – to have an agreement with Russia if that’s possible,” Bolton said.

“This has been something that’s been going on now for nearly seven years, this conflict in Syria,” Bolton noted, adding that his concern was the “Iranian presence now across Iraq and Syria really reaching into Lebanon.”

Asked whether he agreed with the assessment that Syrian President Bashar Assad had effectively “won the war” against Syria, Bolton deflected.

“Well I don’t think Assad is the strategic issue. I think Iran is the strategic issue,” he said, listing off a string of accusations against Tehran including their alleged “conventional forces in the Middle East.”

For their part, Tehran and Damascus have denied all claims about Iranian forces in Syria, pointing out that Iran is present in Syria only in an advisory capacity in the country’s fight against Islamist extremism.

John Bolton has been a keen proponent of military intervention against Syria going back to the Bush administration. Earlier this year, in the run-up to the Western missile strikes against Syria in April, the national security advisor reportedly advocated a considerably more significant intervention, promoting strikes which would be “ruinous” to Damascus’s military capabilities.
Bolton was overruled by Defense Secretary James Mattis and Joint Chiefs Chairman General Joseph Dunford, who had opted for more limited strikes, which proved a failure.
Source: Sputnik
Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 555
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    555
    Shares
ALSO READ  Israeli attacks against Iran no longer limited to Syria: report

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Harrie van der Haghen
Guest
Harrie van der Haghen

Iran was on the list of countries for regime change.
Here is what general Wesley Clark said about it :

est338lapua
Member
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
est338lapua

comment image

Harrie van der Haghen
Guest
Harrie van der Haghen

I don’t want to have anything to do with antisemitism, but if you want to analyze US Middle East politics you can’t block out the influence of Jews who feel sympathy for Israel.

Harrie van der Haghen
Guest
Harrie van der Haghen

Israel wants to weaken the power of the nations that hate Israel. Syria and Iraq are done, so now the focus is on Iran. Bolton’s ideas are shaped by the applause he got during the speeches he gave, and by the money he got from Jewish donors. Also career perspectives played an important role. Now he is working for Trump, while steering Trumps policies to his objectives. I think Trump has promised war with Iran to his campaign financiers, and he is surrounded by a lot of Jews in his family and in his business environment and politics. So now… Read more »

Yes You
Guest
Yes You

America had nothing to do with the war breaking out,, no not us!
https://ahtribune.com/world/north-africa-south-west-asia/syria-crisis/1135-day-before-deraa.html