Damascus is not surprised by a WikiLeaks assertion that the OPCW report on the alleged April 2018 chemical attack in the Syrian city of Douma was significantly doctored, Imad Moustapha, the Syrian ambassador to China and a former envoy to the United States, said on Monday.

The ambassador believes that it was really done to point the finger at the Syrian government and to cover up armed groups.

“The information revealed in this email is not new to us. The Syrian government has already been told by previous investigating teams that their reports were significantly editorialised and twisted to convey a predetermined indictment against the Syrian government while all evidences were pointing to the armed groups and their White Helmets stage directors”, Moustapha said.

He stressed that “every team without exception” had assured the Syrian government that their findings substantiated the government’s account of events, which, nevertheless, had not been reflected in the final report.

“However, the reports published by the OPCW secretariat came in stark contrast to their findings and were heavily manipulated to serve the political agendas of the Western powers”, the diplomat added.

The ambassador added that the OPCW has discredited itself by its “biased” reports and should no longer be trusted, while independent investigations could be well conducted under the aegis of BRICS nations or the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

“The OPCW has completely ruined its reputation as an honest arbiter. Any investigation conducted by its inspectors will end up in the trash-bin of its secretariat, while a report on the outcome of its findings would have been already prepared, even before the start of their investigations. If an independent investigation is to be carried, then it probably should be under the umbrella of the BRICS group, or the Shanghai Organization, but definitely not by the OPCW that has allowed itself to become a pawn in the dirty war against Syria”, he said.

ALSO READ  Iran calls on all uninvited foreign forces to leave Syria

On Saturday, whistleblowing website WikiLeaks published an e-mail, sent by a member of an OPCW fact-finding mission to Syria to his superiors, in which he voices his “gravest” concerns over a redacted version of the report he co-authored. According to the OPCW employee, the modified report misrepresented facts, omitted certain details and introduced “unintended bias”, having “morphed into something quite different to what was originally drafted”. In the three-page letter, he outlined some of “particularly worrisome” aspects.

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Member
Regular
Commenter
Louisa Mubarak Sedin

Good luck to the Syrian Army in Idlib I am not surprised. What US is doing hope they leave Syria soon I used to visit my Aunt in Damascus miss Syria ❤❤👍

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

White Helmets = al-Jazeera video-team. The dark hand of Qatar is more behind it than anyone else.
US pull out = Turkish invasion… Are you sure you want it? Moreover, they’re just 500. USA is not the problem, the problem is the ErDOG madhater

Sweet Robert
Guest
Sweet Robert

Guess what genius, US would not pull out so Turks forced their hand. Now US military directly supporting DMC which are former ISIS losers. ErDogran halted the Kurd/Israeli dream state. Syrian army now manning the northern border and YPG lost big numbers of member and important assets. Syria will not protect these traitors when they refuse to reconcile. Turks want them out of the zone 100%. YPG Attrition happening.