Ayman Soussan, an assistant to the Syrian Foreign Minister, confirmed on Sunday that talks between Damascus and the Kurdish forces in Syria’s northeast have intensified due to a possible Turkish military operation.

“The Kurds are an integral part of the Syrian nation. We are sure that we are able to resolve a number of difficult issues through a dialogue, and this is guaranteed as long as the dialogue is based on the principle of territorial integrity of Syria and the unity of its people,” Soussan said at a press conference, adding that the dialogue between Damascus and Kurds continued, but further intensified against the background of possible offensive against Kurds by Turkey.

On Wednesday, Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad said that Damascus intensified negotiations with Kurds in Syria’s northeast in light of Turkey’s pledges to launch an operation against Kurdish militias. He added that he remained optimistic regarding the talks’ prospects and did not think that the negotiations were in a stalemate.

In December, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced that the Turkish army was ready to start an offensive against the Kurdish forces on the eastern bank of the Euphrates at the earliest opportunity.

However, after talks with US President Donald Trump, who informed the Turkish counterpart of the US troops withdrawal from Syria, Erdogan shelved its plans, saying that the offensive would be launched only after the complete pullout of the US forces.



Source: Sputnik

Share this article:
  • 77
ALSO READ  Breaking: Syrian Army captures another town in southern Idlib

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

What happens is exactly what I predicted about 3-4 years ago here.
And nor only about Putin game aimin at having SAA teaming wth SDF/YPG at ousting Turks+proxies but also that, once the conflict would be near the end, IDF would start wiping out IRGC and Hellbollah, that USA were transferring the management of the Levant to Russia, etc etc.
Nope, I ain’t a prophet : it’s just understanding what was n presence and applying the causality law.

Famed Member
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, IDFs’ turning against Syria’s Shiite allies is premature and counter productive. IDF thus try to prolong the Syrian oil war to weaken Syria.

Iran is spending about 6 billion on military while Israel can spend about 20 billion. Currently Iran is no threat to Israel.

Turning against Iran thus only serves to please KSA and UAE. And I wonder who pays for that. Israel’s own economy cannot generate the 20 billion that are funneled into the IDF this year. Whose mercs are they.