Syria born Zahra Ramadani, who is currently living in London had hoped to be in Sydney for its famous New Year’s Eve fireworks display.

Although at first her Electronic Travel Authority (ETA) application had been approved, this was later revoked and she could not enter Australia.

“I went to check-in [for my flight], and I got an email from the High Commission saying it had been overruled and that I was not eligible for a visa to Australia,” she told the Australian Broadcasting Company. “I asked what was wrong. I got a reply saying it was issued in error and it needed further time for processing.”

She said she called the Australian High Commission and was told to apply for a ETA because “maybe they could get it through faster”.

“[The eVisitor visa] form was really complicated,” she said.

“I rang my friend and told her I needed her details, because I was asked for my companion’s details, my employer’s details, it was very ridiculous.”

Ms Ramadani said the questions on her application were very different to those of her friend, who is also British but born in Bahrain.

“She entered Bahrain [as her place of birth], which is also a Muslim country. Her page two was very different to mine. Bear in mind that we’re both British, both not born in the UK,” she said.

“She got an automated response saying it was all fine. I didn’t hear anything.

“When I asked [the High Commission] why I had a different form to my friend’s in the first place, I didn’t get a response. For me, the suspicion started there.

ALSO READ  Russian military gets upgraded T-80 tanks

“The last time I went to Syria was about six or seven years ago. I’ve never had any problems. No convictions, nothing.”

When contacted, a spokesperson from the Department of Immigration and Border Protection said “the individual has made two separate applications for two different visas to enter Australia”.

“In such circumstances the department needs to resolve the different visa applications,” the statement said.

“The department is in contact with the individual applicant and is working to resolve the application.”

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.