During the evening hours, the 154th Brigade of the Syrian Arab Army Republican Guard – supported by Hezbollah and various Shiite paramilitaries – captured Kiffin village in northern Aleppo from Islamist rebels while Kurdish troops of the YPG and Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) seized several kilometers of road along the strategic Gazianstep-Aleppo including the town of Deir Jamal. Reportedly, Kurdish fighters and Syrian troops have set up a joint checkpoint near Kiffin as to avoid skirmishes between these two factions.

Over the past weeks, Islamist rebel forces in northern Aleppo have lost tens of villages and more concerning for the Syrian opposition, insurgents have also had their main supply line to Aleppo city severed by advancing government troops. As to combat the YPG and SAA in northern Aleppo, Islamist rebel forces have initiated a coalition called ‘Jaish al-Halab’, which consists of Harakat Ahrar Al-Sham, the Free Syrian Army, Jabhat Al-Shamiyah, Jaysh Al-Islam, and Jaysh Al-Mujahiddeen.

Not long ago, a YPG official announced that Kurdish forces would launch a large-scale offensive in northern Aleppo as to connect Afrin with Kobane and Hasakah. Although no official treaties have been signed between Kurdish forces and government troops in the countryside of Aleppo, a non-aggression pact could be signed in the near future as both parties face common enemies – namely, ISIS and Islamist rebel groups in northern Aleppo.

Share this article:
  • 139
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    140
    Shares
ALSO READ  Syrian Ministry of Defense warns of fake army pages spreading false news
Student currently living in Denmark. Special focus on news from Syria, MENA map-making and strategical military analysis.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

10 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Amin
Amin
2016-02-08 03:23

No. You make a mistake. SAA, due to security reasons that almost will happen in the future, does not let any Kurdish groups connect Afrin with Kobani and Hasakah. That was the reason they planned to go to the north at first instead of going to the south and encircling rebels in Allepo City.

stein
stein
2016-02-08 09:16
Reply to  Amin

Interesting, but ‘almost will happen in the future’ does not make sense in English. What ‘security reasons’ do you refer to?

tipex12
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted
tipex12
2016-02-08 15:50
Reply to  stein

think he means once they link all parts of kurds controlled land, the SAA is going to have a hard time getting the land back once the SAA and the kurds destroy ISIS and other terrorists

Mark
Mark
2016-02-08 20:38
Reply to  tipex12

Wrong. Neither the SAA, nor President Assad have no interest on Northern Syria, Kurdish region anymore. They will leave there to Kurds for forever. Let it be under an Autonomy, Federation or whatever. After Syria win the war, again an a new “border neighbourhood” with Turkey? No, thanks! In the North, Kurds are great opportunity for whole the Syria as a bufferzone between the terrorist state Turkey and Damascus. Think bigger.

Glenn Swart
Glenn Swart
2016-02-08 13:04
Reply to  Amin

Please tell us more?

Amin
Amin
2016-02-09 16:08
Reply to  Glenn Swart

tipex12 was right. See. Getting the land back from Kurdish groups is much harder for SAA than liberating those lands from ISIS or the other terrorists by pro-army groups. In one case Kurds give back the land to SAA and it is when they have obtained very special privileges from the Syrian government like the right to have independence and have a self-government body established to govern Kurdish lands. And the result? Some countries which have mutual interests in this matter ( Turkey, Iran & Iraq) and have more or less Kurdish lands in their own counties will feel a… Read more »

Andrew
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Andrew
2016-02-08 02:30

Good work.

Hands OFF Syria
Hands OFF Syria
2016-02-08 05:08

stop calling them ‘rebels’

mh370
mh370
2016-02-08 06:42

they are rebels rebels rebels

Amin
Amin
2016-02-08 08:24

Terrorists