A final report submitted by the Swedish Defence Forum to Defence Minister Peter Hultqvist proposes a major defence overhaul, dubbed “the greatest reinforcement since the 1940s”.

The goal of the defence expansion is to allow the country to survive three months without international assistance in case of a military attack.

Among other things, the report suggests restoring the Norrland regiment stationed in Arvidsjaur and the Gothenburg amphibian battalion on Sweden’s west coast alongside two brand new regiments, whose location is yet to be defined. Furthermore, an air wing in Uppsala shall be restored. The number of submarines will be increased from four to five, and more of the current-generation Jas Gripen fighter jets will be retained, the Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter reported.

Sweden’s war organisation shall also be expanded from 60,000 to 90,000, including the Home Guard and civilians. The annual number of conscripts shall also be increased, from 3,000 to 8,000 people.

The entire defence logistics, management and other support functions must be expanded, the report said, calling for major investments in quantity equipment such as trucks, special vehicles and ammunition. The acquisition of new material must be guided by the “design to cost” principle.

In total, military spending will be increased by SEK 5 billion ($500 million) per year by 2025, ultimately reaching 1.5 percent of the GDP.

Defence Secretary Björn von Sydow warned of a deteriorated security situation, in which “an armed attack against Sweden cannot be ruled out”, in effect repeating the “Russian threat” mantra often employed by Swedish top brass to justify defence allocations or military beef-ups, such as re-militarising the Baltic island of Gotland after only a decade of demilitarisation.

“The security policy situation has deteriorated in Sweden’s neighbourhood and in Europe. The Russian action in Georgia in 2008, in Ukraine since 2014, as well as in Syria since 2015, shows a Russia willing to use military means to achieve political goals”, von Sydow said, citing “significant limitations in operational ability” the Swedish Armed Forces are currently facing due to personnel shortage and material deficiencies.

ALSO READ  China to be offered Russia's Su-57: report

The report named Finland as the country with which Sweden enjoys the deepest military cooperation. Still, the cooperation needs to be ehanced in order to make prompt decisions, the report pointed out.

A separate brigade of 5,000 soldiers was proposed to back up Finland in the event of crisis and war.

“Preparations should be made for up to a brigade, with reinforcement resources, to operate in Finland, in crisis, war danger or war”, von Sydow said.

At present, Sweden’s defence expenditure is about 1 percent of its GDP, which is a far cry from around 3 percent it enjoyed at the height of the Cold War.

The Swedish Armed Forces number about 20,000 active personnel. After about a decade of a volunteer-based army, Sweden resumed conscription, once again amid specualtions of Russia’s “assertive behaviour”.

With the 1814 Swedish-Norwegian War formally being the last one Sweden has participated in, Swedish aircraft took active part in the NATO-led 2011 military intervention in Libya, despite officially being non-aligned.

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

7
Discuss

avatar
3 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
RicoDaeshbags-SuxVon AbeleAndrey Subbotin Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Andrey Subbotin
Guest
Andrey Subbotin

One wonders what kind of “political objectives” we could have in Sweden. We do not even have a land border.

Member
Newbie
Commenter
Upvoted
Karel Vd Geest

Did not know Sweden is an island. One learns every day.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

“what kind of “political objectives” we could have” => In fact, it should be the same as for the whole EU : assuming a coherent defence for the whole union, and everyone doing his own cooking on his own side is “very bad” (think about the Dotard’s voice, LOL!), moreover, we end with redundancies, and I prefer not imagining the logistics hëll if things go SHTF, another thing at NATO level : in 1940, the Brits fled the Battle of France and despite desperate supplications, I know the Yanks are very bad in geography, but taking 4 years to come… Read more »

Rico
Guest
Rico

WHAT RUSSIAN THREAT? THERE IS NO *RUSSIAN THREAT*

Member
Newbie
Commenter
Upvoted
Karel Vd Geest

Sweden made the analyses Russia is a potential hostile country and it needs to take precautions. They are fully right and entitled to do so.

Member
Newbie
Commenter
Upvoted
Karel Vd Geest

Was informative through. Sweden is an example to many states, like mine, in rearming. Dutch army should be expanded by at least 100k, most of them by draft, which should be reactivated.

Von Abele
Guest
Von Abele

Swedes arrangement delusional like you. The real threat is the USA and their willful minions. . Swedes have an existential threat in their borders from mass-immigration due to NATO interventionism.