Russia’s Sukhoi Su-57 PAK-FA fifth-generation stealth fighter is listed in the Trump Administration’s new Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) as a developmental dual conventional and nuclear capable strike aircraft. If the NPR is correct, the Su-57 could potentially supplant the Su-34 Fullback bomber—which is Russia’s current nuclear-capable strike aircraft—for intermediate range missions against heavily defended airspace.

Indeed, the NPR contends that Russia is continuing to modernize its arsenal of non-strategic nuclear arsenal of roughly 2000 nuclear warheads.

The Euro Disney Resort officially opens with its theme park Euro Disneyland. The resort and its park’s name are subsequently changed to Disneyland Paris.

Jim Gary’s “Twentieth Century Dinosaurs” opens at the Smithsonian Museum in Washington, D.C.. He is the only sculptor ever invited to present a solo exhibition there.

“Russia is modernizing an active stockpile of up to 2,000 non-strategic nuclear weapons, including those employable by ships, planes, and ground forces,” the NPR reads. “These include air-to-surface missiles, short range ballistic missiles, gravity bombs, and depth charges for medium-range bombers, tactical bombers, and naval aviation, as well as anti-ship, anti-submarine, and anti-aircraft missiles and torpedoes for surface ships and submarines, a nuclear ground launched cruise missile in violation of the 1987 INF Treaty, and Moscow’s antiballistic missile system.

The NPR posits that the Russians place a premium of nuclear weapons due to Moscow’s “de-escalation” doctrine, which is why the administration is seeking to build new types of American non-strategic nuclear arms.

“These supplements will enhance deterrence by denying potential adversaries any mistaken confidence that limited nuclear employment can provide a useful advantage over the United States and its allies,” the NPR states. “Russia’s belief that limited nuclear first use, potentially including low yield weapons, can provide such an advantage is based, in part, on Moscow’s perception that its greater number and variety of non-strategic nuclear systems provide a coercive advantage in crises and at lower levels of conflict.”

ALSO READ  Get a glimpse of China's 1st generation fighter jet in action

Many Russia experts such as Olya Oliker have cast doubt upon the notion that Moscow has lowered its nuclear threshold. Oliker notes that Russian military strategy documents from 2010 actually tighten the Kremlin’s policies on the use of nuclear weapons. Indeed, most experts on Russian nuclear weapons such a Nikolai Sokov—a former Soviet and Russian arms control negotiator—believe that Russia is reducing its dependence on non-strategic nuclear arms.

Nonetheless, it is true that Russia maintains a significant non-strategic nuclear arsenal and a significant portion of those weapons can be delivered by air—even if not specifically by the Su-57 as posited in the NPR. “We do have nuclear bombs for tactical aircraft and air launched tactical nuclear missiles as well. And there are ALCMs [air-launched cruise missiles] under development that will be used by tactical aircraft,” Vasily Kashin, a senior fellow at the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics told The National Interest. “But I do not remember Su-57 being specifically mentioned.

Russia’s X-50 air launched cruise missile might fit into the Siu-57’s weapons bays, Kashin said. However, there is no official word from the Russian Defense Ministry. “It is possible, even likely but not confirmed yet,” Kashin said.

Right now, however, the main Russian threat nuclear air delivery platform is the Sukhoi Su-34. That will probably remain the case for some time to come.


This article first appeared in The National Interest – you can follow them on Twitter @TheNatlInterest

Share this article:
  • 83

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.


1 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Daeshbags-Sux Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Famed Member
Stern Daler

“In violation of the 1987 INF Treaty”?

What a lump of US propaganda in The National Interest!

On Feb. 1 2019, President Trump and Secretary of State Pompeo announced that the following day, Feb. 2, the United States would suspension its obligations under the INF Treaty and also formally announced its intention to withdraw from the treaty in six months. Shortly thereafter, Russian President Vladimir Putin also announced that Russia will be officially suspending its treaty obligations as well.


Hey, TNI is the Nixon-gang, what else can we wait from a stupid neo-cons “think-tank” except debilitating paranoia to boost arms sales uselessly? These idiots make me laugh any time they speak weaponry! Even our old Super-Etendart navy-strike aircraft with only 2,100kg payload could carry an ASMP mach-3 nuclear cruise missile with a 300 kilotons warhead! Mirage IIIE, SEPECAT Jaguar A, and Super Étendard could all carry several AN52 nuke bombs since these (near 30 years retired now) weighed 455kg and these aircraft where shielded against EM effects. Even the Korea-war F-86 Sabre could carry a nuclear bomb… And well,… Read more »


BTW, they’re really making ROFL with the 2,000 nukes being refurbished, so is it for Putin with the 9M730 Burevestnik with capabilities similar to the 1955-1964 Project Pluto/SLAM AKA the ‘Flying Crowbar’ : probably the height of Cold-War stupidity The concept was as dumb as nuking your own territory Then the Kh-47M2 Kinzhal with very dubious tech features communicated since it’s obviously a modified Iskander, nevertheless, characteristics they say freaking look like the 1962 AGM-48 Skybolt which was simply trashed by McNamara with a single word : “Useless” Now the Status-6 Poseidon Well, 1st no super-cavitation feature like on… Read more »