Russia’s advanced Su-57 fifth-generation fighters will be shown to foreign delegations for the first time at the MAKS-2019 air show, Russian state arms exporter Rosoboronexport told reporters.

“The advanced Su-57 fifth-generation fighter will be shown to Air Force delegations and all guests of the MAKS International Aviation and Space Salon in Zhukovsky, Moscow region, from 27 August to 1 September”, it said.

The statement comes after a source in the aviation industry told Sputnik in March that Russian Su-57 fighter jet already has an export permit, and the Russian government is reviewing documents to officially rename the aircraft from T-50 internal designation to Su-57.

In 2017, a pair of Su-57 fighters for the first time demonstrated elements of air combat at the MAKS air show. One of the aircraft conducted an attack, and the second went away from it, showing how super-maneuverability works, which allows the aircraft to “dodge” the enemy. Pilots also demonstrated aerobatics, including the Pugachev Cobra, flying at extreme angles of attack and driving at minimum speed.

Su-57 is a stealth air superiority fighter created by Russia’s Sukhoi Company. The fifth-generation fighter jet, formerly known as Prospective Airborne Complex of Frontline Aviation (PAK FA), is a single-seat, twin-engine multirole “stealth” aircraft developed for air superiority and attack roles.

The fighter is equipped with an advanced avionics system and airborne active phased array radar as well as with a variety of high-precision weaponry.

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
ALSO READ  Al-Qaeda leader urges followers to carry out new attacks on 9/11 anniversary

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

1 COMMENT

  1. +++ “showing how super-maneuverability works, which allows the aircraft to “dodge” the enemy”
    => The goal is to dodge incoming enemy missiles, but obviously, Su-57 is less manoeuvrable than Flanker… And… Beware about types of warheads and proximity fuses… Dodging is OK in case of hit-to-kill stuff, eventually in case of proximity fuse + annular blast… in case of multidirectional blast with many tungsten sub-projectiles, or simply an array of kinetic flechettes released in the direction of the target and acting like a shotgun, the spread will be too wide to be dodged…

    +++ “Pugachev Cobra, flying at extreme angles of attack and driving at minimum speed.”
    => How to get shot down in combat! Nice for the Bolshoï, not when being shot at, and even Manfred von Richthofen already knew it more than a century ago!

    There are many points that are highly likeable on Su-57, I really don’t get why they don’t push these up while they actually insist on stuff where, well, these would have been a real advantage… 50 years ago…

    Moreover, if for sure, the materials weren’t adapted for stealth, it wouldn’t have taken a lot to adapt an already existing design to Petr Ufimtsev’s ‘Theory of Physical Diffraction’ :
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/AIRPOWER16_-_Air_to_Air_SK35C_Draken_%2829366239356%29.jpg
    https://weaponsandwarfare.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/vffvd.jpg
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/AIRPOWER16_-_Air_to_Air_SK35C_Draken_%28color%29.jpg
    Wouldn’t be a huge problem to adapt a F-117 styled geometry to the Saab J-35 Draken, would it?