The Russian embassy in London on Friday hit back at UK Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt for calling Moscow a threat to the rules-based international order.

“We do not accept the concept of a ‘rules-based international order.’ The international order must be based on international laws – legal norms agreed by all states,” a spokesperson for the embassy said in a statement.

The spokesperson said London was trying to replace the idea of international laws by a set of vague rules to cover up its legal shortcomings and evade responsibility for breaking laws while accusing others of violations.

The Russian Embassy in the United Kingdom also said Friday that it had been taken aback by London’s attempt to avoid responsibility for the Syrian crisis, shifting it onto Russia despite a history of the Western coalition supporting militants in the Middle Eastern country.

“The cynicism with which Hunt shifts the responsibility for further developments in Syria onto Russia is appalling. Let’s not forget that it is the United Kingdom alongside its allies, who bear a huge share of the blame for the many years the Syrian people suffering. Western countries encouraged the adversaries of Assad to an armed confrontation with the government, fueled their hopes for military assistance, consistently torpedoed Damascus peace initiatives, supported accomplices of terrorists and provocateurs like the White Helmets. In April 2018, they committed a direct act of aggression against Syria under the artificial pretext of a ‘chemical attack’, and now they are striving to waive all responsibility,” embassy’s spokesperson said in a statement.

It is the Syrian people who should decide the future of the country and not Moscow or London, the embassy noted.

UK Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said Thursday that Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad appeared set to remain in power for a while due to Russia’s support.
He said Russia, as a dominant power in Syria, was now also responsible for maintaining peace in the war-torn country, including making sure that chemical weapons are not used against people there.
Western states and Syrian opposition accused Damascus in April of being responsible for an alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma, which led to a series of missile strikes by the United States, the United Kingdom, and France on Syria.
Damascus refuted the allegations saying that the attack was plotted by militants to discredit the government troops.
Source: Sputnik
Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 245
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    245
    Shares
ALSO READ  Turkish forces enter Hasakah province, seize new town

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jonah
Guest
Jonah

Excellent response

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

UK/US and their allies talk of rules? They not Russia, Iran or Syria broke rules and international laws. Among the law broken:

A/RES/2625(XXV) = Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

Sweet robert
Guest
Sweet robert

Own it Limeys