The initiators of the draft resolution envisaging sanctions against Syria have deliberately embarked on a course of confrontation, and Russia had no other choice but to veto the document, Russia’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN Vladimir Safronkov has said after the voting at the UN Security Council, TASS reported.

“Despite our consistent appeals, the authors chose a politically motivated path, leading to confrontation and adding complexity to the situation, including on our Security Council platform,” the diplomat said.

“They opted for deliberately heating up tensions, being well aware from the very start that this initiative has no chances of being approved at the Security Council,” he went on.

He said in this situation Russia “had no other choice but to block the passing of this resolution, the sanction list of which is copied from the analogous American list, approved at the start of this year by the previous US administration,” Safronkov said.

Russia voted “against confrontation” by blocking the resolution and that it is “doomed to failure and belongs to history,” he continued.

“We are sending a signal that we can solve difficult tasks and advance in the Syrian settlement only through cooperation,” Safronkov added.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 529
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    529
    Shares
ALSO READ  China denies holding any captured Indian soldiers

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

3 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stern Daler
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler
2017-03-01 05:52

This UNSC move was clearly propaganda actionism. It made no sense politically and had never a chance to pass.

Above all it was justified only by the allegations of SAA gas attacks that had been corroborated solely by terrorists and NGO affiliated to them.

Daeshbags Sux
Master
Upvoted
Rookie Mentor
Commenter
Daeshbags Sux
2017-03-01 07:34

100% OK with the veto.

observe moderately
Regular
Upvoted
observe moderately
2017-03-01 07:32

This is the same goons who used the UNSC to attack several countries in a short period of time.