A senior Russian military official has accused the US of being directly involved in a drone attack on the Russian airbase in Syria’s Khmeimim. The aircraft were controlled from a US spy plane nearby, he claimed.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov was speaking about a report made by Russia’s Defense Ministry. It said that the drone attack on the Russian airbase was directed from a US P-8 Poseidon surveillance plane.

The base located in Latakia governorate has been attacked by primitive drones on numerous occasions. According to Col. Gen. Aleksandr Fomin, Russia’s deputy defense minister, the attack on January 6 was done with direct help from the American military.

Speaking at a high-profile security forum in China, Fomin said a Boeing P-8 Poseidon was deployed in the area on that date, when 13 drones were launched to attack the Russian base. The US reconnaissance plane took control of the drones once the troops defending the base used electronic warfare to disrupt the control signals for the UAVs.

“They were controlled manually, and not by some peasant, but from a capable, well-equipped Poseidon plane,” the Russian general said. He added that the drones were regrouped and directed to suspected zones of vulnerability in the defenses of the Russian base, most likely with the use of satellite data, before being destroyed by the Russian air defense forces.

Russia’s Pantsir S1 air defense systems at Khmeimim base © Sputnik / Dmitry Vinogradov
“If people don’t want to fight terrorists armed with advanced weapons, they should stop arming them,” the general added.

Fomin was speaking at the plenary session of the Beijing Xiangshan Forum on Thursday.

ALSO READ  Jihadists begin large-scale offensive to retake Saraqib from Syrian Army

The Russian Defense Ministry has been alluding to the possibility that the drone attacks on Russian military sites in Syria were being enabled by a technologically advanced party since facing this problem in early 2018, but previously avoided accusing the United States directly.

Fomin’s remarks were endorsed later in the day by the spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry. “We can only confirm this. We received this absolutely credible information from our military specialists. We have repeatedly voiced our concerns about this,” Maria Zakharova said.

Dmitry Peskov called this data “very alarming,” but referred journalists to the Russian military for further comment.

The Pentagon insists that drones used to attack Russian troops in Syria can easily be built from parts available on the open market.

 

 

Source: RT

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 330
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    330
    Shares

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
n.md.148
Guest
n.md.148

it is no surprise that the ameritard govt just wants to rot in perm h**l forever with its allies and zio lapdog supporters with such evil and continuous actions

Sweet Robert
Guest
Sweet Robert

Welcome Back 148.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Except that P-8 Poseidon is not a spy-plane but a pretty heavily armed MarPat (maritime patrol) asset that replaces the old P-3 Orion!

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

If Peskov wasn’t bullshïtting (which he is), this would mean that Russian ECM are pure fïlth since a MarPat aircraft not even specialised in electronic warfare can over-ride the Russian air defences like S-400!

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Moreover, if it took them about 6 months to come to this conclusion, Peskov has just exposed a terrible Russian weakness!!!!

joseph
Guest
joseph

NATO is a criminal enterprise

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Stop smoking dope.

Sweet Robert
Guest
Sweet Robert

Basically what he said was commercial drones, not military encrypted drones, where spoofed(hacked) and redirected to potential vulnerable areas. Terrorists could not hack them but personel aboard the plane certainly could.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Not onboard a P-8 : it’s not equipped for such job. And civilian RSA etc cyphering are not so easy to hack.

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

Who said a spy plane? Can You read? It says US P-8 Poseidon surveillance plane.

p.s. The P-8 conducts anti-submarine warfare (ASW), anti-surface warfare (ASUW), and shipping interdiction, along with an early warning self-protection (EWSP) ability, otherwise known as electronic support measures (ESM). It is designed to operate in conjunction with the Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton Broad Area Maritime Surveillance unmanned aerial vehicle.

rabbi drewzif
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
rabbi drewzif

@ Stern; Spy -surveillance means the same thing. In the opening paragraph it was called a spy plane, and then further on it is called a surveillance plane. Unless spy is an acronym for something else ?

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

With around 10 tons of torpedoes and anti-ship missiles like Harpoon, P-8 role is to sink submarines and ships. Not really the definition of a spy-plane.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

US have dedicated electronic warfare to over-ride or jam signals : EC-135V/W Rivet Joint, EC-130H Compass Point…

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

13 drone manual control posts and gear to hack these into a P-8?
Fomin should be fired for incompetence!