Widening the Panama Canal will cost more than budgeted due to billions of dollars in overruns by the consortium carrying out the work, the canal’s administrator acknowledged Monday.

Grupo Unidos por el Canal (GUPC), which is overseeing upgrades to the canal’s locks, has incurred overruns totaling $2.39 billion.

So far, one of the items has been approved by a mediating panel, worth $227 million.

So “ultimately yes it will cost us more than we had originally planned,” Canal administrator Jorge Quijano told journalists, during installation of a first Pacific lock-gate.

Widening project manager Ilya Espino said “we know we are going over budget, what we don’t know yet is how far.”

The expansion, already a year behind schedule, had been forecast to cost $5.25 billion.

The project has already been plagued by delays, strikes and bitter disputes over cost overruns with the consortium, which is led by Spanish construction firm Sacyr.

Initially scheduled for completion in 2014, the project’s due date has been pushed back to early 2016.

Work began in 2007 to expand the canal with a third set of locks to enable it to handle the modern mega-freighters that global shipping companies prefer.

An estimated five percent of global maritime trade passes through the canal, whose main users are the United States and China.

Nearby Nicaragua, meanwhile, launched construction last month on a rival canal, a $50 billion project that the Chinese firm behind it plans to complete in five years.

In Nicaragua, both ports and the canal will be designed to handle the modern mega-ships favored by global shipping firms, which can carry up to 25,000 containers.

ALSO READ  Iranian fuel seized by US to arrive in Texas

Even after completion of widening, the century-old waterway in Panama will only be able to handle ships carrying up to 12,000 containers.

 

AFP

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.