NATO believes that US strike drones and target missiles for ballistic defense do not violate the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on Friday.

“These issues have been discussed for several years, the question of UAVs, ballistic and target missiles, which are used to test the ballistic defense. These systems are not in violation of the INF treaty,” the NATO chief said, responding to a question from TASS at a press conference on the results of the Russia-NATO Council session in Brussels.

As Stoltenberg asserted, “Russia continues to raise this issue to deflect tension from the real problem,” posed by new Russian missiles as he believed.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov earlier stated that Washington interprets the treaty’s obligations quite freely “when it hinders the creation of armaments important to them.”

This concerns the use of target missiles (Hera, LRALT and MRT) during missile shield weapons tests, as their characteristics are similar to the capabilities of intermediate and shorter-range missiles, which the United States classifies as ‘surface-to-air’ missiles permitted by the treaty.

In contrast, Russian specialists believe that the development of technologies for the production and use of missiles with a banned range of capabilities are being tested under the guise of these launches.

In October 2018, Russian President Vladimir Putin noted that the use of strike drones by the US was a direct breach of the INF accord because they actually did not differ in any way from intermediate-and shorter-range missiles.

More:
http://tass.com/defense/1041821

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 45
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    45
    Shares
ALSO READ  China has revolutionized their 2nd aircraft carrier: video

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

LOL! Such missile technologies are mastered by both Yanks and Popovs since the 50’s/60’s and by some others too.
Stupid bullshïtting on both sides.