North Korea argued Wednesday that the admission of inaccuracies in the memoir of a high-profile gulag survivor rendered any existing or future UN resolution on Pyongyang’s human rights record “invalid”.

Defector Shin Dong-Hyuk acknowledged this week that some elements of his story as told in the best-selling book “Escape from Camp 14” were inaccurate, although he stressed that the crucial details of his suffering and torture still stood.

But a spokesman for North Korea’s Association for Human Rights Studies, said his admissions “self-exposed” the flimsy foundations of efforts by the United States and other “hostile forces” in seeking to censure Pyongyang for its rights record.

In a statement carried by the North’s official KCNA news agency, the spokesman noted that Shin was among those defectors who had testified last year before a UN Commission of Inquiry that concluded North Korea was committing human rights violations “without parallel in the contemporary world”.

Undated photo released on January 13, 2015 shows North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un during an inspection of the Air and Anti-Air Force of the Korean People’s Army command in North Korea

The commission’s report formed the basis of a resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly last month that urged the Security Council to consider referring Pyongyang to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

– A ‘false’ document –

The North Korean spokesman said Shin’s recent retractions proved that the commission’s report was “a false document cooked up on the basis of false testimonies made by human scum”.

“So, needless to say, all the resolutions on human rights forcibly adopted against (North Korea) on the basis of such false documents are invalid,” he added.

ALSO READ  North Korea is preparing to unveil new strategic weapon: Yonhap

The Security Council held its first-ever discussion on the North’s rights record in December, but any referral to the ICC would almost certainly be vetoed by permanent members China and Russia.

The North has repeatedly sought to discredit Shin as a fabulist and criminal, and last October aired a TV interview with his father who called Shin a “liar” and denied the family was even in a labour camp.

North Korean defector Shin Dong-Hyuk speaks during a White House vigil at Lafayette Park July 10, 2012 In Washington, DC

Shin said his father must have been coerced into denouncing him.

North Korean rights advocates have expressed disappointment with Shin but stress that the huge volume of corroborative testimony of systemic rights abuses in North Korea remains unchallenged.

Michael Kirby, the retired Australian judge who headed the UN Commission of Inquiry, said Shin’s partial retractions were “substantially immaterial” to the panel’s findings or recommendations.

– Shin testimony ‘not critical’ –

Stressing that Shin was only one of 300 witnesses interviewed by the commission, Kirby said the panel’s conclusions were based on a mass of “overwhelming” evidence.

“The dispute over Mr Shin’s evidence appears to relate to the exact detention camp from which he escaped,” Kirby said.

“In the big picture of gross abuses of human rights of the entire population of North Korea over more than 65 years, his experience — although very important to him and his family — is not critical to the inquiry,” he added.

For activists within the North Korean defector community, however, Shin’s admissions are a genuine blow, especially given his high profile.

ALSO READ  Turkey, Russia failed to reach common position on Syria’s Idlib – Source

North Korea’s inaccessibility makes it hard to verify individual defector accounts of their lives in the reclusive state, placing a lot of weight on their personal credibility.

Shin was something of an activist poster-boy, giving speeches around the world, penning editorials and picking up awards.

The US-based Human Rights Watch described him as the world’s “single strongest voice on atrocities taking place in North Korea”.

Shin has acknowledged that the damage his retractions have done meant he “may not be able to continue” his activist work.



Share this article:

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.