The Lebanese Ambassador to Russian Federation, Chawki Bou Nasser told Sputnik News on Tuesday that Beirut requested a large number of Kornet ATGMs (anti-tank guided missiles), T-72 Tanks, and advanced cannons from Moscow.

“Lebanon needs weapons to fight these people [terrorists], and especially the Russian rockets, there is one well known, Kornet, because Lebanon got some of the weapons and used them effectively, and is still working with the Russian side to provide these kinds of weapons… Kornet, and the cannons, and the tanks, T-72 tanks, although old — but Russia promised to renovate them and to update the systems in these tanks — and of course the shells for the cannons, ammunition,” Nassar said.

“Lebanon is, of course, expecting to get these within a year,” the ambassador said, expressing hope that Russia will also follow up on its previous pledge to supply up to nine helicopters through a grant.

Lebanon has experienced a large influx of terror-related activities after the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) first targeted the town of Jaroud Qa’a in the Beqa’a Governorate.

Due to growing security concerns, the Lebanese government and military have reached reached out to a number of countries for assistance, including the Russian Federation.

With the Islamic State and Jabhat Al-Nusra (Al-Qaeda group) terrorists wrecking havoc near the Syrian border, Lebanon’s internal security is at the utmost importance for the government in Beirut.

The ambassador stressed that Lebanon needs weapons to fight terrorist groups, such as the Daesh and the Nusra Front, on the Syrian border. The two jihadist militant organizations, both outlawed in many countries, including Russia, have seized parts of Syria.

 

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 177
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    177
    Shares
ALSO READ  Lebanese President accuses West of politicizing refugee crisis
Editor-in-Chief Specializing in Near Eastern Affairs and Economics.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
guest
Guest
guest

Ha.
T72 is the same chassis, and hull and turret with weapon, like T90, the present russian MBT.
The diff between 72 and 90 is in optics and fire control. And passive/active armor But what to modernize on the block of iron???

Daeshbags Sux
Guest
Daeshbags Sux

These are not ‘small’ mods at all! Without upgraded armor, any TOW or ‘dumb’ 1971 CRV-7 rocket can just roast such MBT! Optics and fire control are huge (and expensive) updates too. Once done, T-72 stills a very capable MBT by today’s standards and will be much cheaper than putting money in the T-90 (about 2.5M$/unit) or having to wait for the T-14 Armata… Well, a more eco-friendly and less thirsty motor could be nice. Have you ever approached an old tank? A WW2 T-34 motor was used for the Treblinka’s gas chambers (Yup, no Zyklon B here!).

Jango Michael
Guest
Jango Michael

Middle East fall to Russia balance of power

Conor Mcconville
Guest
Conor Mcconville

Lebanon under severe threat from nusra/daesh plus the army is poorly armed and poorly trained the americans gave the leb army prettyuch f**k all prob due to Isreali pressure…. But one thing the russians dont do is be told what to do fair play to them it seems russia offers a fair deal in terms of military, economic and diplomacy

Daeshbags Sux
Guest
Daeshbags Sux

Err, Django : although some ppl still haven’t understood it in US DoS or in Poland, cold war ended in 1991. The question is not balance of power between US and Russia, it’s that barbarians are beginning to spillover into Lebanon. If Lebanon can’t hermetically blocade its borders AFAP, as IS+Qaeda and alikes being on the way to a serious defeat, they are clearly considering rushing into Lebanon and Lebanon is a much easier prey than Syria. Lebanon is not a very rich country, I don’t feel them buying 16M€ Leclerc tanks (a T-90 is 2.5M$ so an upgraded T-72… Read more »

Kayl
Guest
Kayl

These are not advanced weapons.