BEIRUT: Public Prosecutor Judge Samir Hammoud Tuesday transferred to the criminal investigation division a lawsuit filed against controversial MP Khaled Daher over stirring sectarian strife and offending religious beliefs, a judicial source told The Daily Star.

The complaint, filed by Free Patriotic Movement activist Fouad Chehab earlier this month, accused the Salafist-inspired Daher of inciting sectarian tensions, harming national unity and offending religious beliefs.

Daher drew sharp criticism from allies and rivals alike for saying that Christians should have had to remove their religious symbols, including crosses and statues of the Christ, before Muslims were compelled to take down their Islamic black banners in Tripoli.

A copy of the recording showing Daher making the comments before a crowd of supporters in Tripoli was attached to the lawsuit documents, the source said.

“The prosecutor asked the investigation division to transcribe the recording of Daher’s comments to decide whether it constituted a crime and violation of the law,” the source added.

He resigned from the parliamentary Future bloc in light of the controversy. The March 14 bloc has distanced itself from the MP’s comments.

Daher later apologized to Christians, saying his statement was misunderstood and that he did not intend to offend anyone. He also said he respects all religions.

 

– See more at: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2015/Feb-17/287724-lebanon-probes-salafist-mp-over-anti-christian-remarks.ashx#sthash.WO5DqxgB.dpuf

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
ALSO READ  Video footage shows moment Israeli tank flips over

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.