BEIRUT, LEBANON (2:20 P.M.) – A leaked audio of U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s meeting with Syrian Opposition members at the Dutch Mission of the United Nations was released by Wikileaks this week, exposing a 35 minute conversation that was omitted by CNN.

During the conversation with the Syrian Opposition members, John Kerry admitted that he pushed for intervention in Syria, but eventually lost the argument.

‘”I lost the argument for use of force in Syria,” John Kerry told the members of the Syrian Opposition.

According to Wikileaks, “the audio gives a glimpse into what goes on outside official meetings. Note that it represents the US narrative and not necessarily the entire true narrative.”

In addition to admitting that he pushed for intervention in Syria, John Kerry admitted that the U.S. watched ISIS grow from afar in order to force Assad to negotiate with them; however, it would later backfire, as he welcomed Russian intervention against the terrorist group.

The audio was originally leaked to NY Times in late September. CNN, which is the source ((http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/01/pol…)) for the audio posted here, has since chosen to remove it.

Share this article:
  • 535
  • 1.2K
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1.8K
    Shares
ALSO READ  Breaking: Syrian Army's Tiger Forces end Idlib operation, head off to fight ISIS again - reports
Editor-in-Chief Specializing in Near Eastern Affairs and Economics.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Member
Newbie
Commenter
Upvoted

Kerry’s day is numbered.

Daeshbags Sux
Guest
Master
Upvoted
Rookie Mentor
Commenter

I hope so, and not only as secretary of state! So do I hope for Killary and Obongo. Backing Qaedans is nothing else than high treason!

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted

That info is quite old. Plus the US, UK, France, Turkey, Jordan and their Gulf allies broke A/RES/2625(XXV). When the hawks felt they had lost the war that they had started – they pressed the US president for an escalation. At this point Obama had the guts to decline to command an open war of aggression. Knowing that that would lose the “new type” Syrian war. While Kerry is a just a coward that could not stand too lose.

Member
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted

Yes. The woman in the tape never ceases to amaze me. SHE want’s a forciible removal of Assad by the Americans and she sees no problem wth that despite adopting the cloak of moderate opposition. She openly admits that she does not want internationally supervised elections and Kerry has the gall to claim it is Assad and Russia who are scared of internationally supervised elections.

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Yes. But they all do not want fair elections. Nobody is sure to win. Not even president Assad who seems to have gained some popularity in Syria during the war. p.s. Kerry should have told the “amazing” lady to go forth and multiply – instead he discloses state secrets to the public by claiming he has advocated an open war. BTW. What amazes me personally is how coy all were at the beginning in 2012 with their narrative of non lethal aid and how callous they openly admitted in 2016/17 breaking A/RES/2625(XXV). The cabal was about planing and engaging in… Read more »
Daeshbags Sux
Guest
Master
Upvoted
Rookie Mentor
Commenter

“But they all do not want fair elections.”
=> Hey, they want a caliphate! Don’t look further! Well, maybe an Ottoman Empire II… Hard to say, but smth like this for sure.

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted

The Muslim militants consider democracy a farce. The successors of the prophet must rule Sharia no human rights.

Member
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted

Can you name a candidate other than Assad who has a chance?

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
No. p.s. I do not know how their election system works. If their system is like France. Maybe someone popular from the army or the smaller parties can collect all voters that do not like president Assad in the second or third round of voting. In some other electoral systems he can probably win. Even if the majority does not like him. The Syrian refugees that I know here will not vote for him. But as I said nobody is sure. BTW. IMHO there is only democracy with basic human rights – it is even more essential than the one… Read more »
Daeshbags Sux
Guest
Master
Upvoted
Rookie Mentor
Commenter

No 3rd round in France. Just two can go 2nd round, well, maybe 3 if they are really close but I don’t remember it ever happening.

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted

Ok. I meant after elimination to two candidates. But did not know exactly which round.

Member
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted

Here is the info from the 2014 Election. Assad would have had an even larger majority but “rebel” forces targetted those who wanted to vote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_presidential_election,_2014

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted

I read it in the news then. Did not know the Wikipedia article. But from afar You cannot tell whether ballots are rigged.

Member
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted

“..from afar You cannot tell whether ballots are rigged.”
That is true. It is why Assad encouraged the widest range of freign observers to take part in monitoring the election. Predictably they refused. This is a standard tactic. They refuse involvement for some specious excuse and then afterwards claim the election wasn’t fair. They did it with rimea and East Ukraine as well. In the event, Assad organsied a wide range of foreign observers for the election.

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
I read the news then and know. But I also know how ballots can be rigged and influenced by fear. = > with Crimea and East Ukraine = > They should have changed the borders and split the land to give the majority what the people in the specific areas wanted. And let the regions have association to both EC and Russia. Far better then the current mess. Plus cheaper too – war costs money. That is my humble opinion anyway. p.s. And that should have have been done years ago – right after/at the dissolution of the UdSSR. Now… Read more »
est338lapua
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted

No, no, no, what you are hearing has to have some other deep, almost mystical peaceful meaning which most people like us can not understand, because Syrian and miltary technology expert Daeshbag Sux keeps telling us that the US is not responsible for the invasion of Syria by “moderate” and non moderate terrorists…Hahahahaha

Daeshbags Sux
Guest
Master
Upvoted
Rookie Mentor
Commenter
Can you stop being stupid Mr. pro-terrorism? Where have you seen I dismissed the US of responsibility? Fucking nowhere! I just consider that there is much more responsibility on the KSA/Qatar/Turkish side. And I knew about this leaked talk as soon as it was on Wikileaks. Yes Kerry wanted to really imply the US at this level, so did Cameron, but it was also refused by their parliament. There is another leaked talk with several “rebels” representatives where he says they’re implied in smth totally illegal and since the Russian came in, he wasn’t optimistic at all… Had Kerry and… Read more »
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted

=> Visibly, Germans did the same => Madame even kept Germany out of UK, France… attack on Libya.

est338lapua
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
wasn’t UK who made possible for the House of Saud to be in power? Not being for US UK France Saudis will be reduced to buying luxury things and riding camels,you would better learn about the role of UK on the 1st Crimean war, and the role of UK on facilitating the Armenian genocide by article 16 Treaty of San Stefano, all US wars from Vietnam onward never benefited the US population, it was only benefit for the elite and a power game to prove the world that the Yanktards are the empire, nothing changed from then, only now US… Read more »
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted

As Wilson put it the US needs new markets. And he found them in war. Kurd mounted militia plus some Kurd Sunni tribes were helping the genocide. Some Sunni tribes later wanted to create a religious state. p.s. Note that You will always have people that facilitate genocide and ethnic cleansing for a share in the plunder.

Janjak Desalin 1804
Member
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted

.338, you’re looking at the man behind the curtain; remember, it takes self-awareness to recognize that the wizard’s power to deceive/obscure comes only from one’s own naivete, willful ignorance, or denial, any of which could be overcome with conscious, self-aware effort.

Additionally, I was not aware of Turkish Kurds’ complicity in the Armenian genocide. However, should Syrian, Iraqi, and Iranian Kurds also be held to account?

est338lapua
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
I will always remenber in one of the 1rst interviews at the peak of the Kurdish warrior propgaganda by western media, the journo asked a commander if he considered Daesh to be the main enemy, he clearly stated ALL ARABS ARE OUR ENEMY. I reckon and dont deny some kurdish has been misstreated, but Kurdish state is the new Israel 2.0 project,serving as buffer to the 1st Israel, it will be carved by violence, and once they are in power they will behave the same as before, but of course the will be no White Helmets and no news about… Read more »
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted

Sunni Turk state officials were the masterminds. It is the political responsibility of Turkey. The Armenian genocides were already started by the last Sultan. p.s. Note that You will always have people that facilitate genocide and ethnic cleansing for a share in the plunder. AFAIR Kurds had been recruited into a Turk militia that was used for all sorts of jobs.

Member
Newbie
Upvoted

He is a cocky Zionist stooge.

Member
Newbie
Commenter
Upvoted

Can’t say I am not surprised….it was quite obvious that the US, Turkey, and the Gulf nations were using ISIS and Al Qaeda to overthrow the Syrian government and install their puppets….now due to their ignorance and callous disregard for humanity & public safety, Islamic extremism has exploded throughout the Middle East & Europe leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands….Thanks Obama!!

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted

El mundo lo sabe lo que sus gobiernos ocultan, el papel de EE.UU. cínicamente mantiene la doble moral sinverguenza.