Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Moscow hopes for the return of the United States to the UN Human Rights Council, as he spoke in Moscow on Thursday at a joint press conference with Secretary-General of the United Nations Antonio Guterres.

“We hope that this decision is not final and the United States would reaffirm its commitment to the United Nations, particularly in an important area such as human rights”, said Lavrov.

Guterres backed the position of Russian FM, stating that UN “would of course much prefer for the Unites States to remain in the Human Rights Council.”

US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley had announced that the US is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council on June 19th, following the Council’s vote last month to probe killings of Palestinian protesters in Gaza.

Transcript:

SOT, Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations: “As I said clearly immediately after, we would of course very much prefer for the Unites States in the Human Rights Council. And I do believe that the Human Rights’ architecture is a key tool at the present moment in order to promote and to protect human rights around the world. And we hope that the work will go on in this direction, because human rights is one of the pillars of the action of the United Nations.”

SOT, Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister (Russian): “We hope that this decision is not final and the United States would reaffirm its commitment to the United Nations, particularly in an important area such as human rights. As you know, the United States considers itself to be a champion in this field. But if it were so, Washington would have arguments that would allow it to continue working within the Human Rights Council, particularly with those who promotes initiatives and stances quite contrary to those of the US.”

ALSO READ  NATO amasses troops along Russia border amid Ukraine turmoil: MoD

SOT, Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister (Russian): “In regards to the accusations of Nikki Haley against the Security Council in the endless hostility towards Israel, I cannot agree with this. The Security Council has an obligation to consider reports of the Secretary General on the situation in the Middle East, including the situation in the Palestinian-Israeli settlement. These reports are based on decisions that were taken in the Security Council in the past. The discussion that unfolds on the basis of these reports reflects the events that take place in the Middle East, directly between the Palestinians and the Israelis. A recent review of the turmoil that has occurred there, the clashes, the shelling of Israeli territory from the Gaza Strip and the Israeli response, the review has shown that the majority of the Security Council members are very objective. At the very least, the condemnation of the shelling of Israel was clearly voiced by the Russian delegation.”

 

 

Video and translation credit: Ruptly

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 18
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    18
    Shares
The International News Desk reports on issues and events world wide.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Member
Regular
Upvoted
Gustavo Lopez Velazquez

If UN Human Right promise never ever in its existence to criticize Israel by any criminal action, then US may accept to be part of this organization.

Daeshbags Sux
Member
Master
Upvoted
Rookie Mentor
Commenter
Daeshbags Sux

Actually, EU should also withdraw from the UNHRC : this body has became a pure laughing stock which has became rigged by the worst violators of human rights on Earth! Hillel Neuer, the boss of UN-Watch NGO, declared, about Saudi-Arabia getting a seat at UNHRC : “It is scandalous that the UN chose a country that has beheaded more people this year [2015] than ISIS to be head of a key human rights panel. Petro-dollars and politics have trumped human rights.” It wasn’t far that Muslim-Brotherhood led Sudan, with its prez responsible for a genocide, got a seat too. China… Read more »