BEIRUT, LEBANON (8:30 P.M.) – Experts from Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) confirmed the destruction of 10 out of 12 chemical weapons facilities in Syria, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported on Tuesday.

According to these experts, the only 2 chemical weapons facilities that were not destroyed were currently inside opposition-controlled territory.

While this doesn’t necessarily mean the opposition was behind the attacks in Khan Sheikhoun earlier this month, it does raise questions about the fate of these last two chemical weapons facilities and whether or not they are still used.

On Tuesday, the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, told reporters during his press conference with his Italian counterpart that the Syrian military was not to blame for the chemical weapons attack in Khan Sheikhoun and slammed the U.S.’ allegations against his government.

Share this article:
  • 1.3K
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1.3K
    Shares
ALSO READ  Syrian President appoints governors of Raqqa and Idlib for first time in years

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

Be Civil

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Make it better

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Now the hard part!

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Daeshbags Sux
Master
Upvoted
Rookie Mentor
Commenter
Daeshbags Sux
2017-04-11 22:42

Some say the UN is useless, OPCW is the proof it isn’t!

9
Translate
Stern Daler
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler
2017-04-11 22:55
Reply to  Daeshbags Sux

Serenity DbSx, any idea where OPCW reported this in original text?

6
Translate
Mad Axe
Mad Axe
2017-04-11 23:28
Reply to  Stern Daler

Here is more: https://southfront.org/syrian-government-is-ready-to-let-experts-examine-shayrat-airbase-for-chemical-weapons/

4
Translate
Stern Daler
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler
2017-04-12 09:04
Reply to  Mad Axe

Nice find but was to be expected. AFAIK the weapon stores were hit and that can result in a catastrophe if chemical weapons were present.

p.s. Some claim the US war chief Trump used the missiles to get spies pardon inspectors into Syrian defense air ports.

0
Translate
fatoomsh
fatoomsh
2017-04-13 07:34
Reply to  Stern Daler

Theres a chance trumps bombing was a master stroke you know. How do you respond to a fake chem attack? By staging a fake airstrike where you phone ahead, then miss the runway completely. And in the process completely confuse the braying Dem warpigs and Repub traitors likeMcCain.

0
Translate
Jahangeer
Jahangeer
2017-04-14 21:17

The whole thing is cover-up by Russia. It’s even going as far as to making claims in OPCW instead. Even if it did not have those facilities, that doesn’t mean it couldn’t have bought new weapons or still have old weapons. This report tries to make it sound like OPCW is itself saying it. Improper news report.

0
Translate