US Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday he had reached an agreement with his Russian counterpart that could see the UN set up a panel to identify those behind deadly chlorine gas attacks in Syria.

“We also talked about the UN resolution and indeed I believe reached an agreement that should try to see that resolution voted shortly, which would create a process of accountability which has been missing,” Kerry said a day after talks with Russia’s Sergei Lavrov in Malaysia.

The UN Security Council could vote this week on a resolution to establish the panel, aimed at bringing to justice whoever was behind the use of the chemical weapons.

The United States has presented a draft resolution to the 15-member UN Security Council that calls for it to set up a taskforce to “identify to the greatest extent feasible, individuals, entities, groups, or governments” involved in the use of chemical weapons.

“So what we are trying to do is to get beyond the mere finding of the fact that it may have been used, and actually find out who used it, and designate accountability for its use,” Kerry told reporters after a regional security forum in Malaysia.

“And what we will achieve, we believe, with this resolution is the creation of mechanism which actually enables us to do that. That is our hope.”

A Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman confirmed the issue was discussed.

“All I can say is that an agreement like this can only be made by the UN Security Council,” said Maria Zakharova.

 

AFP

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
ALSO READ  Celebrations erupt in Al-Hasakah province after Syrian Army-SDF agreement: videos

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.