BEIRUT, LEBANON (6:30 P.M.) – The former Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), General Gadi Eisenkot, sat down for an interview with the Israel Hayom newspaper on Saturday to discuss the 20th anniversary of the unilateral Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon.

In his interview, General Eisenkot said that Hezbollah had succeeded in its strategic goal with the Israeli army, which was to remove Israel from Lebanon through a guerrilla war and war of attrition campaign against the IDF.

Eisenkot affirmed that Hezbollah had succeeded, through a series of sophisticated military operations, in embarrassing the Israeli army and causing a number of deaths among the IDF, forcing it to leave Lebanon.

The former IDF chief explained that the long stay of the army in Lebanon (1982-2000) was a strategic mistake, and cost Israel a heavy price, noting that he agreed with the opinion of the former Prime Minister, Ehud Barak, of the necessity of getting out of Lebanon.

General Eisenkot indicated that Barak’s primary intention was to withdraw from southern Lebanon through an agreement with the Syrians and the Lebanese, but in the end he withdrew in a unilateral move that was condemned by some Israeli politicians.

In particular, Generl Eisenkot said that the withdrawal left behind a lot of equipment, which was later used to bolster the image in Lebanon of the IDF’s defeat.

Israel would later fight another major conflict with Hezbollah in 2006, which would prove to be costly, as Lebanon suffered several casualties and heavy material damage.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share
ALSO READ  Israeli Defense Minister sends warning to Hezbollah leader

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.