BEIRUT, LEBANON (12:00 P.M.) – Some American Syrian conflict analysts are convinced that the Islamic State terrorist group is planning an offensive against pro-government forces to retake the ancient city of Palmyra.

So-called Syrian War ‘experts’ from the United States have been spreading rumors of a possible upcoming attack by ISIS terrorists to capture the city of Palmyra from the Syrian Arab Army and allied forces.

One particular pro-Coalition source, claiming to cite local reports, even went into enough detail to state that ISIS will probably muster 100-200 fighters with tank, artillery and heavy machine gun support assets to try and retake the ancient city.

Some official Syrian opposition sources have also made the claim that ISIS is preparing to attack Palmyra. However, when tracking the origin of their information it has become apparent that such sources are themselves only citing the reports of US analysts.

The particular fixation by US Syrian conflict ‘experts’ on Palmyra and ISIS as of late remains unclear. Generally the sources making the current claims only comment on events post-fact rather than trying to make predictions.

Over the course of the Syrian War, Palmyra has swapped hands four times. ISIS seized the city from the Syrian Arab Army in May 2015 who retook it in March 2016 only to lose it again in December 2016; in March 2017 Syrian army-led force claimed back Palmyra for a second time and have held it ever since.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 225
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    225
    Shares
ALSO READ  Heavy clashes breakout between Turkish-backed militants in northern Aleppo

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.