5 1 vote
Rate Article

DAMASCUS, SYRIA (4:30 P.M.) – After maintaining a presence in the area since 2014, ISIS militants have withdrawn from Syria’s southern governorate of Sweida, thus conceding control of many villages to opportunistic US-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA) factions.

Almost without firing a single shot, opposition fighters took control of the Nashwan, Beir Al-Awda, Alqaneyat, Rajm Aldawala & Al-Asfar areas in northern Sweida according to an online statement released by the FSA-linked ‘Lions of Sharqiyah’ on Tuesday.

Yesterday, the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) and National Defence Forces (NDF) also liberated a large chunk of Sweida territory from the Islamic State.

ISIS militants were forced to withdraw from the region due to collapsing defensive lines at Raqqa, Aleppo, and Palmyra. Although mere speculation, the jihadist units may be transferred to the Deir Ezzor front in a last-ditch bid to capture the city entirely.

After also being expulsed from Rif Dimashq province earlier in the week, the Islamic State now only holds a foothold in 8 of the country’s 14 governorates.

Jaish Al-Islam posted a map showcasing the aforementioned advances:

Chris Tomson | AMN

Share this article:
  • 91
ALSO READ  US military vehicle breaks down while attempting to block Russian patrol in Syria: video
Student currently living in Denmark. Special focus on news from Syria, MENA map-making and strategical military analysis.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nestor Arapa
Nestor Arapa
2017-03-29 00:10
Rate Article :

El gran perdedor el gobierno Sirio, los mercenarios de la Monarquía Saudi y de occidente se fortalecen en esta zona, quizá mas adelante se convierta un parecido a Idlib.
Insisto el gobierno Sirio debe adquirir o pedir mas aviones para la fuerza aérea a Rusia para lanzar ofensivas en varios frentes a la ves.

Sergio Gonzalez
Sergio Gonzalez
2017-03-29 06:22
Reply to  Nestor Arapa

La infraestructura Siria apenas se sostiene por si misma. No hay ninguna manera de adquirir nuevo material cuando ni siquiera se tiene certeza de que haya una base completamente segura para desplegarlo. De momento, Siria debe jugar al ajedrez con los pocos recursos que tiene.

De la misma manera que las Fuerzas Tigre siempre son rotadas hacia frentes más críticos cuando se los necesita, lo poco que queda de la Fuerza Aérea debe ser tratado con sumo cuidado y utilizado en los casos más críticos, cuando se necesita poder de fuego extra y cuando el apoyo Ruso no alcance.