Stock photo of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of Iran operating a T-72 tank during a military exercise in the southern part of the country.

Media reports previously suggested that the Trump administration is struggling to create conditions that would prevent the US from returning to the nuclear deal with Iran, as POTUS is projected to lose the presidential race to Democrat Joe Biden.

Iran will respond to any attacks on its territory conducted by the US, government spokesman Ali Rabiei has stated. He added that he doesn’t believe the US wants to “cause insecurity in the world and the region” with its actions.

“Any action against the Iranian nation would certainly face a crushing response”, Rabiei said.

The comments from the Iranian government come amid reports by The New York Times and Reuters that Trump called a meeting with his aides to ask whether it was possible to launch an attack on Iran’s “main nuclear site” in “the coming weeks”. Reuters noted, citing anonymous sources, that the Natanz enrichment plant was the “main site” that Trump had in mind.

Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, acting Defence Secretary Christopher Miller – who recently replaced Mark Esper, and head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley reportedly attended the meeting. According to both reports, Trump’s advisers tried to dissuade POTUS from attacking Iran, as only two months remain until his projected departure from the White House.

Trump’s Alleged Fight to Keep US Away From Iran Nuclear Deal

The news of Trump’s alleged plans to attack Iran were preceded by another report by Axios, which claimed that POTUS is also mulling introducing a “flood” of anti-Iran sanctions. The reason for the move, according to the media outlet, is to prevent Joe Biden from reversing Trump’s withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, in case POTUS fails to snatch victory in the presidential election from Democrat Joe Biden’s hands with a series of lawsuits.

ALSO READ  Iran announces joint project with Saudi Arabia in Persian Gulf

The Trump administration reportedly expects the planned new sanctions to be too politically dangerous to lift, thereby thwarting potential efforts by Biden to negotiate a return of the US to the JCPOA. Tehran earlier stated that it would be ready to negotiate on the deal only if the US lifts all sanctions, also suggesting that Washington would need to compensate the country for the losses it sustained over the last two years.

A file photo taken on February 2, 2019 shows Iranians visiting a weaponry and military equipment exhibition in the capital Tehran, organised on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the Iranian revolution. – A longstanding UN embargo on arms sales to and from Iran expired early on October 18, 2020, in line with a 2015 landmark nuclear deal, the Iranian foreign ministry said.

POTUS withdrew the US from the Iran nuclear deal on 8 May 2018, gradually reinstating sanctions against the country’s banking, shipping, and energy industries, despite condemnation of these actions by the remaining signatories, including the US’ European allies.

A year later, Iran declared that since it could not benefit from the deal anymore, it was no longer bound by the JCPOA’s provisions. Tehran boosted its nuclear fuel stockpile beyond allowed limits, with most of it being stored at the Natanz plant, which Trump has reportedly been seeking to attack.

 

Source: Sputnik

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments