BEIRUT, LEBANON (2:45 P.M.) – For the second time in a week, the Indian Armed Forces have dispatched a large number of reinforcements to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh, following a fierce firefight with the Chinese military nearly two weeks ago.

According to the Times of India, the Indian Army sent additional reinforcements to eastern Ladakh on Sunday after Chinese troops allegedly trespassed across the border and stationed dozens of temporary tents.

In part of a move described as “requisite counter measures”, the Indian Army has reportedly moved additional infantry battalions to Ladakh.

The TOI article said that the reinforcements had been shifted to this area to ensure that they can replace “in rear locations the acclimatized troops shifted forward to the sites of confrontation with the Peopls’s Liberation Army.”

Other contingency plans have also been put in place. Units in the Leh infantry division comprising 12,000 soldiers have been moved to occupy forward operational alert areas from their permanent depth locations.

In the wake of the month-long sporadic skirmishes on the bank of Pangong Lake, Demchok, and Galwan Valley areas in Ladakh, Indian Army Chief General M.M. Naravane visited Ladakh to take stock of the ground situation on Saturday.

After deploying additional troops to “reclaim authority” over Galwan Valley, Beijing pitched 70-80 tents and parked heavy vehicles as the Chinese side considered that India’s defence fortifications were “obstructing normal patrols and operations of Chinese border troops”.

India’s Foreign Ministry countered the claim and said that it is China that is hindering the patrolling along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

ALSO READ  Indian army deploys to 4 strategic peaks in response to Chinese military 'incursion': official

Even though it has been almost three weeks since a violent clash on the northern banks of Pangong left soldiers from both the sides badly injured, the deadlock continues, according to sources. There have been scuffles between the patrolling parties of both the sides after the violent clash on 5 May.

Meanwhile, the Indian Army has also denied reports of the detention of one of its soldier by Chinese troops in Galwan Valley.

“There has been no detention of Indian soldiers at the borders. We categorically deny this. It only hurts national interests when media outlets publish unsubstantiated news”, a statement issued by the Indian Army on Sunday reads.

Despite two rounds of talks between the commanders of the Indian and Chinese forces to de-escalate the situation in Galwan Valley, the matter remains unresolved.

India and China share a roughly 4,000-kilometre border ranging from Kashmir to Arunachal Pradesh.


Sources: TOI, Sputnik

Share this article:
  • 1

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.