Protesters play ping-pong on a main road at the Mongkok shopping district in Hong Kong.

Authorities in Hong Kong have suspended talks scheduled for Friday after student protest leaders, looking to revive their flagging movement, called upon supporters to once again take to the streets.

The student leaders now risk loss of credibility in case they are unable to mount a show of strength on the city’s streets.

“The dialogue cannot be deployed as an excuse to incite more people to join the protest,” said Carrie Lam, the chief negotiator from the government’s side.

“The illegal occupation by activists must stop.”

Ms. Lam, the Chief Secretary, stressed that it would be “impossible to have a constructive dialogue”, now that the protest leaders have called for fresh mobilisation in the main centres of protest.

Analysts say that without talks, there will not be a visible focal point to immediately revive the agitation.

Student leader Alex Chow defended the decision to call for mobilisation, but hoped that the Hong Kong government would reverse its decision and go ahead with Friday’s dialogue. “If the chief secretary was sincere, the dialogue would still be going on tomorrow,” he observed.

Realising that further street protests, which had left Hong Kong divided, could boomerang, some students leaders are suggesting pursuit of other forms of civil disobedience.

Boycotting taxes

The website of the South China Morning Post quoted student leader Ian Chan Kok-hin, external vice-president of the Hong Kong Federation of Students, as saying that “occupying the roads is just one means of civil disobedience, but there are others”.

He said that all three core elements of the movement — Occupy Central; the Federation of Studentsl; the Scholarism; and other NGOs — would launch another round of civil disobedience.

ALSO READ  New Russian radar system capable of detecting F-35 stealth fighters: Chinese experts

“Boycotting the payment of government taxes” is one of the options that was being considered, he said. “The government will have to listen to the public.”

Protests began in Hong Kong after the Chinese government reiterated its stand that in 2017, elections for the post of the Chief Executive would be held by universal suffrage.

However, the choice will be among candidates that would be screened by a committee. The protesters, seeking unqualified democracy, are rejecting Beijing’s decision to vet the candidates for the CE’s post.

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.