BEIRUT, LEBANON (8:20 P.M.) – Israel’s Channel 7 said that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) faced a “war of attrition” in southern Lebanon, just before it withdrew from the Levantine nation on May 25, 2000.

According to their report, a discussion with Israeli military historian Uri Milstein was held about the 20th anniversary of the IDF’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon.

Milstein explained that the Israel was facing a war of attrition with Hezbollah before their subsequent withdrawal, which caused issues for the IDF inside southern Lebanon.

The historian said that the IDF did not achieve the desired goals in Lebanon, despite occupying southern Lebanon for 18 years, stressing that the military establishment was not successful during these long years, and it did not perform well.

Milstein explained that Ehud Barak, the former Israeli Prime Minister, was the one who stopped this war (the war of attrition), but it was too late, and he called for the unilateral withdrawal from Lebanon in May 2000.

He pointed out that the Israeli Armed Forces and Barak himself have been criticized for this move, as he withdrew from southern Lebanon, overnight, in a unilateral withdrawal, without notifying anyone, which was later considered a victory for Hezbollah.

The historian pointed out that other Israeli parties considered that it was possible to withdraw, while preserving the dignity of the Israeli army, or in another way, preserving its dignity in front of Hezbollah and the international community.

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
ALSO READ  Hezbollah and PFLP officials meet in Lebanon, express solidarity

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.