Monday was a rough day for Harakat Ahrar Al-Sham and their allies from the Syrian Al-Qaeda group “Jabhat Al-Nusra”, the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS), and the Free Syrian Army (FSA) inside the resort-city of Al-Zabadani, as the Syrian Armed Forces and Hezbollah captured 46 buildings from the Islamist rebel groups en route to the remaining enemy positions near the city-center.

For more than 40 days, Harakat Ahrar Al-Sham and their allies have been under a merciless siege from the Syrian Arab Army’s 63rd Brigade of the 4th Mechanized Division and Hezbollah, leaving the Islamist rebel groups with little provisions and very little time to concoct a contingency to evade capture and the loss of this city.

Following numerous negotiations with the Harakat Ahrar Al-Sham fighters, Hezbollah – with the SAA’s blessings – offered one last ultimatum 24 hours ago: either completely surrender and possibly receive amnesty from the Syrian Government or prepare for the Syrian Armed Forces and the Lebanese Resistance’s final assault on the city-center of Al-Zabadani.

On Monday morning, five armed combatants turned in their weapons to the nearest Syrian Army unit and surrendered themselves; this resulted in an agreement to have their case heard by an amnesty council in the Syrian state capital of Damascus.

Part of the surrender terms included their assistance to get the remaining Islamist rebels to turn-in their weapons and surrender the city of Al-Zabadani to the Syrian Armed Forces and Hezbollah; however, Al-Masdar News was informed that the rebel units still refused to surrender Al-Zabadani in the hope that a deal can be worked out between Turkey and Iran.

ALSO READ  US-backed forces send large number of reinforcements to Deir Ezzor after significant losses

The likelihood of a deal between Iran and Turkey is not out of the realm of possibility; however, the Islamist rebels are running out of time, as Hezbollah and the Syrian Armed Forces gave them 72 hours to surrender yesterday.

 

 

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Editor-in-Chief Specializing in Near Eastern Affairs and Economics.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Gilad Giladi
Guest
Gilad Giladi

I have advice for Shiites. Prepare passports and plane tickets and all those who could escape flee from Lebanon today. I do not envy the Lebanese Shiite undercut their lead when they occupy Lebanon