Fifteen years after the bursting of the dot-com bubble, the tech sector is flying high again, with record amounts of cash pouring in, and renewed fears about inflated valuations.

A survey by the EY (formerly Ernst & Young) group counted 3,512 mergers or acquisitions in the tech sector in 2014, for a total value of $237.6 billion, the highest figure since 2000.

The report said the outlook for deals in 2015 remains “robust.”

There are no signs the trend is slowing.

“Tech investment bankers have told us that their pipelines are fuller than they’ve been in years, while corporate development executives indicated they expect to be even busier shopping this year,” said Brenon Daly, analyst at 451 Research.

The 451 Research report suggests more dealmaking is coming in hot segments such as mobile tech, security and cloud computing.

Startups like Uber and Snapchat meanwhile have seen their values soar with new capital inflows.

Thirty-eight tech companies entered the billion-dollar club last year, including 25 in the US, according to the research group CB Insights which tracks venture capital.

Part of the euphoria around the sector also comes from giants like Apple, which broke all records with an $18-billion profit in the past quarter, and Chinese online group Alibaba, which raised a record $25 billion in its initial public offering.

The consultancy PwC said 2014 was the “best year of the decade for global technology IPOs.”

– A question of value –

The key question for investors in the sector is whether the sky-high valuations are indications of innovative companies with tremendous growth prospects or mere speculation.

ALSO READ  Two Chinese aircraft carrier 'killer missiles' hit targets in South China Sea: report

The Nasdaq stock index in New York City, which is seen as an indicator of the tech sector, has not yet touched its March 2000 highs

Uber’s investment valued the ride-sharing service at $41 billion; home-sharing service Airbnb’s worth is estimated at $10 billion, a similar level to that of Snapchat and Dropbox; and streaming music group Spotify at $7 billion.

These investments come in the wake of Facebook’s $22 billion deal to buy the messaging service WhatsApp.

“The valuations are way out of line,” said Roger Kay at Endpoint Technologies Associates.

Still, Kay noted that “the mood is different because people do remember 2000. In 2000 they really thought it would never end, and it was sort of pure bubble euphoria. This time euphoria is tempered with a bit of cynicism.”

– ‘Reality-based’ –

The EY report says however that this time, values are grounded in reality.

“Unlike 2000, it was no bubble,” the report said. “Despite the occasional ‘moonshot’ from a handful of deep-pocketed buyers, the vast majority of deals were measured in reality-based multiples of good-old-fashioned revenue, profit or cash flow.”

Some analysts point out that the Nasdaq stock market index, seen as an indicator of the tech sector, still has not returned to its record high of 5,100 hit in March of 2000.

Attendees examine new smartphones at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas on January 6, 2015

Michael Stiller, tech analyst with Nasdaq’s Advisory Services unit, said the tech sector “generally is still considerably cheaper than in 1999” and that the companies have more realistic business models.

ALSO READ  Taiwan grounds F-16 fleet losing jet as tensions with China increase

“It’s a totally different environment,” Stiller told AFP.

“We now have three billion people online versus 400 million in 2000, a 7.5-fold increase. So many of the ideas that were conceived in 2000 are now feasible as the market is eight times as big relative to 15 years ago.”

Stiller noted that while some tech companies look expensive, these companies have become more mature, and are getting real revenues and profits.

“Large cap tech companies are flush with cash and it flows down to other parts of the sector,” he said.

“Real earnings from tech companies are actually in the books, not just metrics like eyeballs and page views.”

 

AFP

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.