The Israeli claim about conducting military operations in Syria after the destruction of the Russian Il-20, which prompted the Russian military to deliver a modernized export version of its S-300 air defense system to Syria, don’t sound truthful, according to Germany’s Contra Magazine.

“Israel has insisted that the S-300s wouldn’t interfere with its ability to attack Syria, but in the space of over a month since then, not a single media report on such an attack has been made. However, on Monday, Israel said that it has attacked Syria since September 17, and did so coordinating with Russia,” the publication wrote.

“The claim,” according to Contra Magazin, “is obviously intended to strengthen Israel’s resolve to attack at will, especially after the lack of such attacks has raised many doubts.”

In any case, the Monday claim, particularly given the lack of confirmed Israeli attacks, “makes their absence all the more obvious,” Contra noted.

The publication pointed out that in the run-up to the incident leading to the loss of the Russian aircraft, Israel struck positions in Syria repeatedly, with the attacks always accompanied by press reports.

“The assumption that attacks have continued, but that reporting about them simply disappeared, is virtually impossible” to believe, the magazine concluded.

On Monday, a senior unnamed Israeli official told Israeli media that the military had carried out attacks in Syria, “including after the downing of the Russian plane,” and that “military coordination with the Russians continues as before.” Other Israeli, Syrian and Russian officials did not comment on the claims.

ALSO READ  Syrian Army pushes more reinforcements to southern Idlib as offensive looms

Russia began the deployment of a modernized variant of its S-300PM-2 air defense missile system to Syria in early October after a Russian Il-20 reconnaissance plane with 15 airmen onboard was mistakenly shot down by Syrian air defenses attempting to repel an Israeli air attack.

The Russian military accused Israel of deliberately using the Russian aircraft as a shield, and of giving it insufficient warning to make it out of harm’s way.

In addition to the S-300s, Russia has provided Syria with its friend/foe identification system, and promised assistance in the radio-electronic suppression of satellite navigation, airborne radars and combat communications systems of aircraft attempting to hit non-terrorist targets in areas of Syria under Damascus’s control.

Russian air defense troops are in the midst of providing training to their Syrian counterparts, with the training expected to wrap up in December.

In early September, an Israeli official said that the military had conducted over 200 missions over Syria over a year-and-a-half period. It has not been reported to have carried out any strikes since then.

Israel has justified the attacks by saying that they were aimed at countering Iranian influence in the region, and that they targeted pro-Iranian militia groups and Iranian troops.

Tehran has rejected Tel Aviv’s claims, and said that its presence in Syria is legal, and limited to assisting Damascus in the fight against jihadist extremism.

Share this article:
  • 148
  • 4

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2018-11-02 15:46

My, how the tables have turned.

2018-11-03 03:36
Reply to  BDS

Except that IDF has all the necessary gear to take out many more S-300 than Syria has and moreover, can even shoot down aircraft or missilles over the 3 quarters of Iran : Arrow3 doesn’t ranges 250km, it ranges 2400km+…

prince teutonic
prince teutonic
2018-11-02 17:43

“Mighty Jew” afraid of some old Ruski technology? Noooo waaaaay…. 😉

2018-11-03 03:40

I’d like to know what Putin said to Khamenei and Rouhani behind the scene… I don’t think he liked them+Hezb having arms depot so close to Russian bases 😉

2018-11-03 19:58

You can bet, as soon as the Russian trainers are out of the picture Israel will be filling some S-300’s earhole full of long-range attack munitions. It’s the first time US goods have gotten the opportunity to square off with the S-300 directly. Let’s see what they’ve got?