The talks in Geneva scheduled for this Thursday will take quite a different turn than what was originally thought.

US Secretary of State John Kerry was in Riyadh over the weekend to meet with Riad Hijab, chairman of the Higher Negotiations Committee, who has been given the duty of selecting the delegation to Geneva by the Syrian Opposition.

As Gulf News reports, Kerry released a “Russian ultimatum” to the Syrian opposition heavily financed and endorsed by the Saudi government.

Apparently, Kerry has capitulated in his decision and has now been convinced by his Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov. Lavrov has stated that groups such as Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham are terrorist groups. Kerry has since said that the opposition will not take control of Damascus but are in the process of setting up a cabinet of national unity.

Furthermore, according to this deal, Assad will be allowed to run for office again in 2017.

Much to the dismay of Hijab and the opposition, this breaks from Geneva I in 2012 that called on the creation of a Transitional Government Body to replace President Assad. This was one of the cherished victories of the opposition in the prior peace talk. The new meeting will not include such a measure.

Three names have been replaced in the Geneva delegation list as per Lavrov’s recommendation: Saleh Al Muslim of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party, ex-Prime Minister for Economic Affairs Qadri Jamil, and human rights lawyer Haitham Manaa.

The concurrence of Washington and Moscow on this matter is quite a surprise after the developments of the past few months.

ALSO READ  Suspected US drone strike kills foreign leaders of jihadist group in Syria

 

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Brad Blankenship is an American student of philosophy and political science as well as the director of Al-Masdar's podcast.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

3 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alessio Caschera
Alessio Caschera
2016-01-25 14:15

Laura Caschera

Vandy Singh
Vandy Singh
2016-01-25 14:26

Grt

Proka Lazarevic
Proka Lazarevic
2016-01-25 14:30

Good news!!!