BEIRUT, LEBANON (4:45 A.M.) – The full implementation of de-escalation zones in Syria agreed upon by Russia, Turkey and Iran in a memorandum on May 4 in Astana is badly delayed. As we reported back in May the negotiations seemed promising and still on track to be finished within the scheduled time frame.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov told the Russian RIA news, that the meeting has now been rescheduled multiple times: “We wanted to hold it on June 12, but we were told that they will not be ready by that time, then we were told 20, now our Turkish and Iranian partners say that they will not be able to study all the draft documents that we submitted.”

Originally officials announced their ambitions to meet in early June but the latest planning eyes a meeting from July 4 to 5. The parties involved are designated to agree on the last details of the agreement on the establishment of four de-escalation zones in Syria within the fifth round of talks in Astana.

According to the memorandum Russia, Turkey and Iran, which serve as guarantors for the warring parties involved in the ceasefire agreement implicated within the establishment of de-escalation zones, should have set up a joint working group until May 19. In addition they should have completed “the preparation of the maps of the de-escalation areas and security zones and to separate the armed opposition groups from the terrorist groups” by June 4.

Yet as of now neither was the formation of a joint working group announced, nor have updated and more detailed maps on the location of the planned de-escalation zones been published. Participants hope the full implementation of the de-escalation zones could prove to be a first step to reach a lasting settlement of the Syrian conflict.

ALSO READ  Saudi Arabia condemns Turkey's military operation in Syria

 

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 143
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    143
    Shares
Student of Philosophy from Germany. Aside the daily developments in the Syrian conflict itself, mainly focused on the wider geopolitical context and the dealings of the various parties involved.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Daeshbags Sux
Member
Master
Upvoted
Rookie Mentor
Commenter
Daeshbags Sux

What to wait from takfiris? Taqiyya!!!

Assad must stay
Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Assad must stay

The US(tupids)A play in their sandbox at Al-Tanf : they created their own area in the desert : they are protecting some seldom cactus :mrgreen:

Member
Regular
Upvoted
Commenter
brdlip

“and to separate the armed opposition groups from the terrorist groups” Here’s why the delay! To be(head) or not to be(head)… that is the question. I think that the Russians in Astana have deliberately set up this amletic conundrum to lure Erdogan, waving behind his eyes the “international prestige” of being in the panel that “will bring peace to Syria”, and with UN blessing. Something that Erdogan desperately craves for. So he stops his proxies, SAA can free troops for needy fronts, territories get freed and the “rebels” became less and less relevant at the peace table. Putin tried the… Read more »