The UK and France had discussed replacing American forces in Syria with an equal number of troops after Donald Trump’s surprise pull-out announcement last December, The Telegraph reports.

A UK defence official familiar with the matter told the newspaper that the move was supposed to be a “like-for-like replacement”.

Last December, Donald Trump declared that Daesh had been defeated, and the US would recall its nearly 2,000-person military presence in Syria. Thousands of terrorists are still holding out, and the withdrawal has been going down slowly so far, with 1,000 troops remaining in the country to help ‘secure’ its oil, as Trump put it.

Both the UK and France have been taking part in the US-led coalition in Syria, mostly in the form of air strikes. Their governments do not disclose the number of troops operating there.

It is understood that both countries were discussing plans to deploy up to 1,000 military personnel on the ground each, driven by concerns that the US pull-out would contribute to a jihadi resurgence.

The British part of proposal was to send fighters from the Special Air Service (a special forces unit), as well as elite forces like the Parachute Regiment and Royal Marines, according to the report.

Theresa May is said to have dropped the plans after a “few days” of intense discussions because she wasn’t sure whether the US would provide the required air cover and logistical support and because there was a sizeable chance that MPs would reject the move.

At the time, Theresa May’s minority government was under massive pressure from the opposition over the prime minister’s Brexit proposals, and eventually suffered a series of defeats when trying to get a withdrawal agreement with the EU through parliament.

ALSO READ  Battle footage from the Syrian Army's offensive in southeastern Idlib

Replying to a request for comment, a government spokesman told the Telegraph that the UK “has always taken the necessary steps to secure Daesh’s lasting defeat and we continue to do all we can to keep our country safe.”

May’s successor, Boris Johnson, isn’t thought to have seriously considered the plans to swoop in to replace Americans in Syria.

The US-based journal Foreign Policy quoted an American official in July as saying that the UK and France had agreed to deploy 10 to 15 percent more elite soldiers to Syria. The exact numbers of troops involved were not disclosed.

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.