Multinational online giant Amazon is being investigated by the Competition Commission of European Union for its tax practices in the zone. A file photo of the logo of Amazon.

The European Union’s competition authority on Tuesday opened an investigation into Amazon’s corporate income tax practices on suspicion the online retailer is benefiting from an illegal rebate to stash away most of its profits made in the 28-nation bloc.

The move is part of a wider crackdown on multinational firms’ ability to avoid taxes by shifting profits and costs between countries. Apple Inc., coffee chain Starbucks and the financial arm of carmaker Fiat are also under investigation.

In Amazon’s case, the EU is probing whether a 2003 tax agreement struck between the company and the government of Luxembourg where Amazon records most of its European profits is a way to avoid taxes and constitutes illegal state aid, distorting competition.

If the bloc’s executive Commission were to rule against Amazon in the coming months, the Seattle, Washington-based company would likely have to repay taxes for its European operations, its biggest overseas market.

Amazon registers its profits from across the EU at its unit in Luxembourg, Amazon EU Sarl. That unit’s profits are greatly reduced by making royalty payments to another Luxembourg-based Amazon entity, which is not subject to corporate taxation.

That has attracted the Commission’s attention – “As a result, most European profits of Amazon are recorded in Luxembourg but are not taxed in Luxembourg,” it said.

EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia told reporters in Brussels the EU suspects the royalty payments are not in line with fair market rules and are exaggerated so as to avoid taxation.

“National authorities must not allow selected companies to understate their taxable profits by using favorable calculation methods,” Mr. Almunia added.

ALSO READ  Lukashenko invites Russia to hold new joint military drills after Slavic Fraternity

The Commission provided no estimate of the amount of taxes Amazon saved through the arrangement.

Luxembourg rejected the Commission’s allegations as “unsubstantiated.” Its finance ministry said “no special tax treatment or advantage has been awarded to Amazon.”

The tiny landlocked country of some 500,000 people has over the past decades become one of the world’s wealthiest nations by attracting financial firms and large corporations by offering banking secrecy and favourable taxation.

Luxembourg long resisted the EU Commission’s demand to submit tax information on Amazon and other cases, but the government lost a court battle against Brussels and eventually head to hand over the information.

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.