Britain will not hesitate to carry out more deadly drone strikes against militants in Syria planning attacks on the United Kingdom, defense minister Michael Fallon said on Tuesday, as he defended the killing of a British militant of the so-called ‘Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant’ (ISIL) takfiri group.

Prime Minister Cameron told parliament on Monday that he had approved an air strike against a vehicle carrying a British ISIL men in Syria who he said was plotting attacks against Britain.

The attack killed Reyaad Khan from Cardiff and two other ISIL militants including another Briton, Ruhul Amin.

“We wouldn’t hesitate to do it again. If we know there’s an armed attack likely, if we know who’s involved in it, we have to do something about it,” Fallon told BBC Radio.

Human rights groups and some lawyers criticized the decision to authorize the strike, which was carried out in August, saying the government needed to give details about what evidence it had that attacks were planned and to disclose the legal basis for the attack.

They said the action mimicked controversial US drone strike policy and blurred the lines on what Britain was prepared to use such tactics for.

The opposition Labor Party said the decision should be subject to an independent review, and asked for more information on the legal advice the government had received.

Jeremy Corbyn, an anti-war protester and the favorite to be named as Labor’s next leader on Saturday, said the decision needed to be given “urgent consideration”.

ALSO READ  Syrian Finance Ministry seizes Rami Makhlouf's assets after war of words

Fallon declined to give further details on what evidence they had found of plots against Britain or how many other targets it had identified that could be attacked in the same way.

 

AFP

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.